Stop the Occupation of Europe by the EU

Friday 11th June 2021

Barmy Boris Backs BLM

(Updated Sunday 13th June 2021)

Boris has just undermined all the work done by Kemi Badenoch to stop BLM inciting racial hatred in Britain between its minorities and the white majority through the use of CRT in schools and Diversity Training throughout the Public Sector.

I have been giving Boris the benefit of the doubt until now - but no longer. 

It is now clear that  Boris is just another Blair and no different from Biden, and the present Conservative party is little more than a  New  “New“ Labour. 

Is Boris a charlatan who seized the Brexit moment only to use it to further his own ambitions - and leave Britain adrift in an ocean of uncertainty to continue where Theresa May left off - at the mercy of the radical left in Berlin, Paris and Brussels?

In fact, since 1997 all the British people have seen are displays of EU pandering by nefarious governments led by EU /  UN sycophants attempting to "douse the fire" of the desire of the British people to be free of the shackles imposed by its own elected representatives treacherously acceding to the whims of the EEC(EU) since 1973.

We are being led by the nose into the ultimate decline of the English population in particular with uncontrolled mass immigration without end; with massive building across England with little regard for our beautiful countryside. 

All by a totalitarian government driven by mathematical algorithms with little regard for facts and even common sense and a parliament with little regard for those who elected them or for the future of our culture, history, traditions, heritage, democracy or economy.

For Boris Johnson “Brexit” now seems just a minor irritation in his pursuit of his own self-aggrandisement - little else.

Update:

Perhaps Boris does not realise what a real danger BLM and its CRT creed represent - so here is just a reminder of what the fundamental tenet of BLM / CRT is:

"White people are responsible for all the evils in the world" - it does not get any more racist than that.  It blames skin colour for all wrongdoing throughout History and yet Boris is encouraging English sport and others to kneel to BLM. 

Kneeling is the foremost gesture of submission and the sight of British Police offering such a gesture to baying mobs is chilling and bad enough.

Origin of taking the Knee

The death of George Floyd precipitated the widespread "taking the knee" symbolism in the western democracies but is started with Colin Kaepernick refusing to stand for the American Flag / National Anthem in 2016 whilst he was an American NFL Football Quarterback with the 49's. 

He was objecting to the treatment of Black men by the American Police.

He was originally seated but he was persuaded by an ex-military veteran turned NFL player Nate Boyer (link) that "to kneel would be a more effective and respectful way of protesting than just sitting" - which had upset some of the American Military who were dismayed by his refusal to stand for the Flag or Anthem. 

BLM have cleverly appropriated Colin Kaepernick's genuine protest - I understand his protest - but supporting BLM is not the same. BLM have garnered a fortune in donations from around the world on the back of this original protest. 

Unsuspecting, but well-meaning people who support and encourage "taking the knee" are being taken for useful idiots by BLM. Most of whose nefarious activity in the UK / USA /Canada is within education systems and public sector institutions.

Woke "Shaming" and "Cancelling has nothing to do with illegal Police activity; neither does tearing down statues and attempting to change the names of buildings, streets and public infrastructure, nor does training Black-Shirted Militia nor registering a disguised political party, nor does attempting to decolonise every aspect of our school curricula. 

These and very much more are all associated with BLM.

The pupils at the Pimlico Academy recently protested in the name of BLM and attacked the headmaster calling him a racist for introducing a new school uniform which they did not like and objecting to learning about "English Kings and Queens" - these actions by pupils at a well respected school are the "Canary in the Coal mine" illustrating what is being fomented within our education system by BLM.

This is entirely created by the presence of the BLM's Marxist "Critical Race Theory" being pushed in our education system and extensively online. 

The essence of which is to radicalise our children into becoming BLM activists - hating our country, its history and achievements and turn minority groups against the white population and create disorder in society. 

This is just a copy of what Mao Zedong did during the Chinese "Cultural Revolution"  - this is being carried out by the very same BLM supported by our naive sports organisations just to look good with "virtue signalling".

BLM and its associates Antifa are rioting in the USA, they have been since 2020 (link) - they were and still are supported by Joe Biden, president elect at the time, and now de facto President of the USA.

President Joe Biden has rescinded all of ex-President Trump's attempts to prevent BLM's CRT being taught in the US Public School system. 

For his shame he has also gone further and actually advocates for the divisive Marxist Critical Race Theory (CRT) to be taught in those schools - thus furthering his own radical leftwing agenda.

The reason for the Antifa / BLM looting and rioting is "a March against Capitalism" and the two groups have some common aims. 

Antifa are Communists advocating anarchy whereas BLM are just Communists - trying to build a dystopian world copying the manner in which China is currently controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

BLM want American, UK and Canadian Democracies destroyed and replaced with Communism. 

Most of all though those who kneel are encouraging a Marxist Political Party who want to tear down our society. (link)

Its methods are mainly through the education systems in the UK, USA and Canada and online social media. More specifically in primary and secondary schools, colleges, universities and other taxpayer funded public institutions -

See Christopher F. Rufo's CRT Briefing Book  (link) and CRT Video (link).

These BLM activities include registering as what appears to be a disguised BLM political party or a "front" group which allows BLM activists to infiltrate Local and National politics.

These are where radical left-wing BLM activists radicalise our young to hate the white majority and turn on anyone who disagrees with them - in true Maoist "Red Guard" style - including attacking their own teachers, mentors, parents, relatives, friends, their country, its history and its flag.

Wrong Move by Boris

Little else could give the BLM ideology a greater boost and credibility than to have our young boys and girls, men and women see their role models in sport and elsewhere "taking the knee" to BLM - and our Prime Minister, other politicians and big corporations and institutions treating it as a noble gesture and thereby openly supporting the BLM agenda.

Whether or not they realise the consequences of their actions - which simply increases the levels of donations and public appeal - with which to feed its political ambitions. 

But apparently not to support black people? - according to anti-BLM protestors from a growing number of BLM chapters who are now asking what happened to the $90 million in donations? (link)  (which only a small part of what they have received in total).

Apparently, even the well publicised facts that BLM plan to "abolish the Police and Prisons, breakup the patriarchal 'nuclear' family, ban private property and bring down the Capitalist system" - does not seem to concern our over privileged British sports organisations or our Prime Minister.  

Perhaps they think that they will be exempt if they "take the knee"?

The worst part is that BLM ideology is just an updated version of Marx's original use of the simplistic "rich versus the poor" antagonism by substituting (principally) Race, Gender and Sexuality antagonism in its place to effect "Regime Change" through insurrection. 

BLM Political Website and Reparations

BLM has a major interest in Race related "Reparations" from the British Taxpayer (and those in the USA) - which they estimate the amount attributed to Britain is £17 billion in the section headed "Reparations" in its TTIP interim Manifesto - I am sure that it was £14 billion last time read its "Interim Manifesto". 

What a prize it would be for a Marxist Revolutionary group to gain such riches as reward for their actions which amount to little more than "Demanding Money with Menaces".

"TTIP" (The Taking The Initiative Party) does not appear to be a BLM website (it does not explicitly claim to be a BLM website as far as  can tell) it was registered as a political party in England and Wales in 2017. 

Its interim Manifesto makes interesting reading including its proposal for a "Race Hate Register" - its "Reparations" section is on Page 14-15.

The website is now a little more clearly associated with BLM following the attack on Oxford BLM(UK) activist Sasha Johnson - the TTIP website has published a statement attacking the Police handling of the ongoing investigation. 

Notably the TTIP political website has all the hallmarks of BLM without such explicit statement but it was registered in 2017 - long before the death of George Floyd in 2020.  

The Reparation estimate is derived from the amount of cash given to British slave owners as compensation - using money borrowed by the UK government and subsequently repaid by UK taxpayers (by 2014?). (link) and for the section on Reparations (link)

Wednesday 9th June 2021

What you really should know about BLM Part II

In Part I we looked at recent events - which have shown that BLM false narrative has really taken hold and its brand is now worldwide. On the back of which some of its founders and leaders have become  famous celebrities. 

None more so that Patrisse Cullors who has been criticised by BLM insiders and supporters alike for her extravagance (real estate collection) on the back of the activities of BLM.

More particularly for her lack of judgment and empathy towards those "still at the coalface" so to speak, in particular those who have suffered bereavement and violence but have not been  supported by BLM financially. See Part I.

In Part II we look at what BLM is really about and how it operates.

The one fundamental tenet of the BLM movement is that only white people can be racist - which is a racist comment in itself - by simply assigning actions with skin colour.  

BLM do not see it that way, to them it all about politics  - and, in the end it boils down to those with power versus those who want that  power for themselves. So it is the same old Marxism and regime change through insurrection. 

What is different about BLM is the manner of  obtaining power.  It has chosen the Maoist  more insidious route instead of the route preferred  by Corbyn  and Sanders.

The slogan "Black Lives Matter" resounded worldwide because of the very public death of George Floyd by a serving Police Officer - who was subsequently found guilty of murder. 

But the problems that BLM claim are due to racism are not related to Race but related to prejudice and prejudice takes many forms including jealousy (which is not mentioned). 

BLM are concentrating on just a few, mostly using Race and Gender to stir-up hatred between different groups in society as a means of gaining power in the USA, Canada and the UK - in the first instance.  

But these identity differences are really just substitutes for the original “bourgeoise” and the “proletariat” in disguise. 

Diversity Training

This becomes clear in “Diversity Training” and CRT during classrooms and lecture halls.

The typical introduction to CRT is by separating the audience into different groups based upon identifiable characteristics - skin colour or gender or orientation or anything really if it can be used to divide people in a negative way. 

Then the audience is required to identify (with a little help from the instructors) those they believe are “oppressed“ and those who are the “oppressors” - which is very easy to do if you read anything to do with CRT . 

Remember “Four legs good - Two legs bad” from Orwell’s “Animal Farm” - this is the true level of intellectual dialog involved in CRT.

A bigger part  of the training is about denigrated white people and their achievements and emphasising how white people are responsible for all the evils in the world - at the expense of everyone else. 

Then the shaming takes place with white people forced to confess their sins and apologise even if they don't know what they were supposed to have done wrong.

The biggest part though is to try to recruit BLM activists to carry on their divisive message and tactics even with their own relatives and friends.

This is precisely the way that Mao Zedong started his Cultural Revolution - which resulted in the deaths of millions of innocent Chinese. The destruction of Chinese History and Culture - statues, temples, monuments, books,  paintings, texts, art, music  and literature etc.

Hopefully, many people will now know quite a lot about BLM - they have actually been around since an earlier police incident in 2013 in which a white police officer was acquitted, following a shooting death.

BLM describe themselves as a "Marxist Revolutionary Movement" - The three founders, Patrisse Cullors, Alicia Garza and Opal Tometi, are Black Lesbians who have a higher priority for gender issues than race 

They are the ideological "Daughters of the 'Black Panthers'"with trained militias based on that militant group. They were mentored by members of the “Weather Underground” a terrorist organisation active in the 1960s/70s,

The "Black Panthers" were the dominant Communist protest movement in the USA during the 1960s - the same period of time of the "Cultural Revolution" in China under Mao Tse-tung which began in 1966 - beginning with the "Red Terror".

 A series of mass killings took place in China between 1968 and 1971 - the terror then tapered-off, ending effectively in 1976 - the official end of the Cultural Revolution. (link) 

"It (BP) was was a political organization founded in 1966 by Huey Newton and Bobby Seale to challenge police brutality against the African American community."  (Bracket added)

"At its peak in 1968, the Black Panther Party had roughly 2,000 members. The organization later declined as a result of internal tensions, deadly shootouts and FBI counterintelligence activities aimed at weakening the organization." (link)

The following link shows a distinct relationship between the "Black Panthers" and Maoism as evidenced from their own published newspaper in the late 1960's (link)  

How the Cultural Revolution began in China  (BLM copying Mao)

"Radical violence associated with the Cultural Revolution began in the universities and secondary schools of Beijing, where fanatical students, calling themselves Red Guards, responded literally to Mao's call to "bombard the headquarters." Brainwashed by the Communist system and encouraged by Mao, they attacked certain teachers and administrators who they believed were hostile to Mao and his ideals." (link)

Other method of controlling the population involved  turning the children against their parents who would report them to the authorities - resulting in a loss of status, job, friends and ultimate public humiliation. 

The Chinese government has consistently refused to release details of the total deaths from Chinese society caused by Mao's followers during these "purges". (link)  They are a “state secret”.

These are the same methods borrowed from "Cults" to keep their followers in line - keep members "loyal", maintain control,  prevent infiltration and stamp any criticism. 

Numerous innocent and well-meaning people were driven to "suicide" - effectively at the hands of their own offspring - for criticising  Chairman Mao".  

This same behaviour is taking hold currently in the UK - with celebrities forcing the the removal of any presenter who dares to criticise the current "neo-Woke“ (Maoist) advocates - Piers Morgan for example at GMB - and in some instances a replacement deemed more acceptable to the threatening online "mobs". 

It is taking place in America with the social media cancelling ex-President Trump from expressing his right to free speech - but much worse is to come.

Be in no doubt we are experiencing the beginnings of a similar transformation. What happened in China under Mao is planned for the Democratic West - where our own children will be at the vanguard - unless the teaching of "Critical Theory" in our schools is stopped. 

We saw inklings of the power of racial antagonism created by BLM and CRT manifest in the actions of pupils at the Pimlico Academy starting last year in September with the burning of the Union Jack and turning on the headmaster - and protesting in the name of BLM.

"Critical Theory" - '"Critical Race Theory"

This is the vehicle through which the movement will take over the West -  our children will be used by BLM and its backers - including, is seems the current President of the US,  Joe Biden, members of the "Democratic" party and Corporate America - who unwisely a encouraging the teaching of "Critical Race Theory" in American Public Schools. (link)  

The popularity of this radical left wing organisation seems to stem from the acceptance of “Communist Capitalism” and the massive profits gained since 2000 by trading with China by corporate America and big businesses in the west more widely.

Since Chinese Communism is not seen as direct threat. But China has not changed its ideological roots, it suppresses its minorities and uses slave labour to fulfil its orders from the west - but to their shame corporate businesses and governments in the west ignore that and just think of their own profits. BLM follows the same Maoist philosophy as China does.

Critical Race Theory: An Introduction 

” Critical Race Theory views race and racism this way: race is a political construction that was invented by white people to give themselves power while excluding all other races from it, and racism is the ordinary state of affairs in society, present in all interactions, institutions, and phenomena, and effectively permanent in society (short of a full sociocultural revolution that puts them in charge). 

That is, Critical Race Theory assumes that racism is present in everything under a doctrine known as “systemic racism.” Quoting from Delgado and Stefancic,

In other words, it fooled people into believing that they had more freedom and choice than societal structures actually allow. (I lost the link)

As you can see, Critical Race Theory presents a radically different view of our society and of us than most of us recognize or accept. They begin with the assumption of racism and look to find it. 

They say everyone who doesn’t do this is complicit in the problem, including just for disagreeing with Critical Race Theory. And they reject the fundamental liberal, reasonable, legal, and scientific principles upon which liberal societies operate. 

That is, even though they touch on real truths about race and racism in our world, they are radicals in every sense of the word, and there’s almost no reason to believe they describe reality as it is and much reason to believe they get the issue almost exactly backwards. “ (Lost link)

Summary of Critical Race Theory

• believes racism is present in every aspect of life, every relationship, and every interaction and therefore has its advocates look for it everywhere
• relies upon “interest convergence” (white people only give black  people opportunities and freedoms when it is also in their own  interests) and therefore doesn’t trust any attempt to make racism better
• is against free societies and wants to dismantle them and replace them with something its advocates control
• only treats race issues as “socially constructed groups,” so there are no individuals in Critical Race Theory
• believes science, reason, and evidence are a “white” way of knowing  and that storytelling and lived experience are a “black” alternative,  which hurts everyone, especially black people
• rejects all potential alternatives, like color-blindness, as  forms of racism, making itself the only allowable game in town (which  is totalitarian)r
• acts like anyone who disagrees with it must do so for racist and white supremacist reasons, even if those people are black (which is also totalitarian)
• cannot be satisfied, so it becomes a kind of activist black hole that threatens to destroy everything it is introduced into. (lost link

This movement needs to be stopped before it can brainwash anymore  British children - Diversity training should no longer be publicly funded and CRT must be actively driven out of our education system and public bodies / institutions.

Sunday 30th May 20

What you really should know about BLM Part I

"As protests broke out across the country in the name of Black Lives Matter,  the group’s co-founder went on a real estate-buying binge, snagging  four high-end homes for $3.2 million in the US alone, according to  property records."

"Patrisse Khan-Cullors, 37, also eyed property  in the Bahamas at an ultra-exclusive resort where Justin Timberlake and  Tiger Woods both have homes, The Post has learned. Luxury apartments and  townhouses at the beachfront Albany resort outside Nassau are priced  between $5 million and $20 million, according to a local agent."

"The self-described Marxist last month purchased a $1.4 million  home on a secluded road a short drive from Malibu in Los  Angeles, according to a report. The 2,370 square-foot property features  "soaring ceilings, skylights and plenty of windows" with canyon views.  

The Topanga Canyon homestead, which includes two houses on a quarter  acre, is just one of three homes Khan-Cullors owns in the Los Angeles  area, public records show."

"Some fellow activists were taken aback by the real estate revelations.

Hawk  Newsome, the head of Black Lives Matter Greater New York City, called  for "an independent investigation" to find out how the global network  spends its money." (link)

Her response was to accuse White people of being Supremacists and Terrorists for publishing the information. 

According to an article in the New York Post of the 29th May 2021 entitled "Mothers criticize BLM activists for profiting off their dead sons"

"Grief-stricken mothers who have accused Black Lives Matter of profiting from the deaths of their sons condemned the group’s embattled co-founder Patrisse Cullors after she announced she was stepping down from the movement.

“I don’t believe she is going anywhere,” Samaria Rice, the mother of a 12-year-old boy shot by Cleveland police while playing with a toy gun, told The Post. “It’s all a facade. She’s only saying that to get the heat off her right now.”

"Lisa Simpson, a Los Angeles-based mother whose son was slain by police in 2016, also blasted Cullors."

“Now she doesn’t have to show her accountability,” Simpson, 52, told The Post. “She can just take the money and run.”

"Cullors, the executive director of the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, announced on Thursday she was leaving the group a month after The Post reported on her $3.2 million real-estate buying spree and questions about the group’s finances." (link)

"In addition to the mothers, BLM Global Network Foundation also faced criticisms from their own members last year. In an open letter, 10 local BLM groups ripped the foundation for what they called a lack of accountability and transparency."

“To the best of our knowledge, most chapters have received little to no financial support from BLMGN since the launch in 2013,” said the chapters, which included groups from New Jersey and the Hudson Valley.

A few months later, BLM Global Network Foundation disclosed that it had raised $90 million in donations, fueling even more criticism. (link)

BLM Donations

"National Arm Of Black Lives Matter Spent Millions On Travel And Consultants, Financial Statements Show" 

"BLM Global Network spent $899,000 on travel, $1.6 million on consulting and $2.1 million on personnel costs during its 2017, 2018 and 2019 fiscal years, the financial statements show, together comprising 83.3% of its total spending during the three year period. 

"BLM Global Network granted $328,000 to outside organizations, which include local BLM chapters, during that same time frame, a figure that represents about 6% of its total spending."

“The numbers you have for the prior years do not reflect, for example, the in kind support for chapters and fundraising directed to chapters and programmatic assistance to chapters, that would not show up as direct grants on the audited financials,” 

"BLM Global Network Managing Director Kailee Scales told the DCNF on Tuesday. “That work was carried out by employees and consultants to BLM.”

"But Scales did not answer when asked how much of its spending during that timeframe reflected the in-kind assistance she says BLM Global Network gave to its local BLM chapters versus the development of the various art projects the organization advertises as program areas on its website." (link)

"A spokesperson for Thousand Currents, which was formerly called “IDEX,” confirmed in an email to the DCNF that it was approached by BLM Global Network in 2016 to create a fiscal sponsorship arrangement, which enables the activist group to use Thousand Currents’ charitable status to receive tax-deductible contributions."

"Former BLM activist Ashley Yates has publicly criticized BLM Global Network since as early as 2018 for what she says is a lack of transparency and has accused the organization of squandering money on excessive travel and compensation for its top staffers while giving little to its affiliated chapters.

"Yates is described on a GoFundMe fundraising page established last year to support her work as having “[M]et with President Obama at the White House in November of 2014 after the officer who murdered Micheal Brown failed to be indicted by a grand jury” and that she “was among the protesters who made headlines by interrupting presidential candidates Bernie Sanders and Martin O’Malley at Netroots Nation in 2015.” 

"Yates also profiled in a 2018 New York Times article about the depression and physical strains suffered by young black activists."

“I had concerns since the donations started rolling in from day one and I asked each of the co founders individually what happened to all the money several times,” Yates tweeted in January 2019. “Each time I got the run around, outright dismissed.” (link)

“BLM did not create or build this new grassroots movement against police brutality and racism; they capitalized off a nameless groundswell of resistance sweeping the nation, branded it as their own, and profited from the deaths of Black men and women around the country without seriously engaging, as a national formation, in getting justice for fighting families,” BLM Cincinnati wrote."

“All the while raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars from high-end speaking engagements and donations from foundations that support the Black struggle.” (link)

BLM UK's Political Party

Following the shooting of Sasha Johnson at a party in south London she was reported to be a senior member of BLM's UK Political Party - the 'Taking The Initiative Party" (TTIP).

A quick check on the Electoral Commission Website confirms that the political website "Taking The Initiative Party" (TTIP) is registered and approved (PP6615) - but there is no mention of Sasha Johnson or BLM (link)

Even more interesting is the fact that it was first registered in 2017 - so BLM are politically active under the name of TTIP - under an assumed name. Meanwhile BLM attempted a register under its own name  but was rejected in February 2021.

"The Electoral Commission has rejected a controversial application to set up a Black Lives Matter (BLM) political party in Britain because its name would be 'likely to mislead voters as to the effect of their vote'." (link) 

But BLM appear to have succeeded in misleading the Electoral Commission in 2017 and subsequently - since "TTIP" is, apparently, "BLM" in disguise! 

If true, then clearly "TTIP" should be de-registered for the same reason that the "official" registration attempt by BLM was rejected.

Much more interesting information to come.

His Royal Highness the Prince Philip will be sorely missed. He always stood by and comforted Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth, he was a tower of strength and a guiding light. Never shrinking from fulfilling his roles and duties, and promoting the Royal Family and Britain. 

HRH Prince Philip was an icon of free-speech, a military man with a love of life, and a wonderful sense of humour, he inspired many, was highly respected and gave everything for his family and his adopted country - to which he was always loyal. 

We will always miss him and his strength of character. RIP

We send our condolences to Her Majesty and her family - she is in our hearts and thoughts. 

Unfortunately, Meghan and Harry and the Oprah interview will always be associated with his death. Their indifference to his plight and the hurt they caused within the British Royal Family will be an everlasting testament to their lack of  respect, empathy and even simple human kindness for other human beings in their time of suffering - they should hang their heads in shame.

                             ---------------------------------------------------------

Attack on the Royal Family while HRH Prince Philip was ill in Hospital  

Tuesday 9th March 2021

 
"What Meghan Wants..."

 
Just prior to the wedding it was reported that Meghan Markle wanted to wear a particular Tiara, but she was blocked by the Queen. Allegedly, as a result, Harry confronted his Grandmother and told her "What Meghan wants, Meghan gets!" 

 
Meghan did not get what she wanted then and her "to do list" also included another item in particular - the title of Prince for her son, the Sovereign's Great Grandson Archie. 

 
One can only speculate about what else was going through her mind - perhaps she also thought that she should have been made a Princess instead of a Duchess and live in a Palace rather than a granny flat in the grounds of a Palace. 

 
However, it became clear what was going through her mind when she upped sticks to the US via Canada with Harry and a UK taxpayer paid for protection team.

 
She had plotted revenge for their (her) "treatment". Which led to the "press conference" with Oprah Winfrey (whom she had invited to the Royal Wedding).

 
Meghan's friend Oprah seems to think that some older people are racists and she would be happy to get rid of any who are not Woke (Maoist).

 
To be more precise: "'OPRAH WINFREY claimed racism could be solved once "older people" who had been "marinated" in it had "died'." (link)

 
Note: The word "Racism" was invented by Lenin in order to shut down any debate on the subject of racial differences between people; a lazy way of hiding the fact that people are not that different under the skin. The made-up Marxist "Critical Theory" was developed solely for the purpose of creating antagonism between people of different class, colour, traditions, gender or cultures - in order to foment revolution - i.e. Regime Change.

Meghan and BLM

Meghan and Harry are promoting the idea that they are a caring couple working to spread goodwill and love throughout the world - but Meghan's associations and behaviour are a polar opposite to that narrative. 

The cold revenge visited upon the British Royal Family after they and the British people went out of their way to make them both welcome - is just one example. 

Meghan's default position is "but what about me and how I have suffered!". She showed little obvious care for the plight of Prince Phillip or the distress caused to the Queen because of his illness and the attacks by her and Harry

 
But Meghan's support for "Black Lives Matter" which is a Marxist (Maoist), anti-white racist, revolutionary movement that has targeted the United States and the UK with a plan to turn each of them into a communist dystopia, Including the removal of the British Monarchy, is more concerning. 

 
BLM's ambitions are not a secret - it wants to abolish the Nuclear Family, Heteronormativity, Prisons and Capitalism. It also has trained militias "waiting in the wings" - on display in the UK and rioting on the streets in the USA. 

 
What is less well known is what BLM are up to in the background - 9/10th of its activism is directed to infiltrating the Institutions of State in the - USA and UK - with "Diversity Trainers" using Maoist cult methods of "shaming" and "cancelling" against white people - all paid for out of public funds (~£100,000 pa). 

 
Trump banned them in the US, but Biden supports them. Boris Johnson does not support them in the UK, but Keir Starmer and the radical far-left Labour party etc. are supporters. 

 
An example of how BLM operate - can be seen from their infiltration of the Royal Society of Dramatic Arts (RADA) in an attempt to turn it into a BLM activist organisation. (link)

 
The three founders of BLM Patrisse Cullors, Alicia Garcia and Opal Tometi - have done very well out of BLM - in spite their objections to Capitalism - they have made a fortune and live the lives of celebrities - as do many other Marxists (funny that they do not practice what they preach). 

 
Meghan is enamoured with BLM and making money, planning to make a documentary about Patrisse Cullors as part of a $100 million Netflix deal. (link)

For more about BLM (link)

Meghan and the Royal Family

The behaviour of M & H regarding the RF is appalling - clearly they did not get what they really wanted by being a part of it. 

They have nothing to gain by attacking the Royal Family - unless they want to bring it into disrepute based upon false claims of Racism as a reason for not making Archie a Prince and not providing protection at the expense of the UK taxpayer. The Canadians also refused that ridiculous demand, and Biden is probably less likely - Harris might offer though.

Archie was not discriminated against in any way - he was instead used by Meghan and Harry as a centrepiece in a bizarre game of "hide and seek" with the Press and the Public - which is largely continued.

The question of skin colour was put into the interview as a trap for the Queen - who would be better off simply wishing them well and not "rising to the bait". 

This Harry and Meghan anti-Monarchy attack is calculated and precisely targeted at undermining the institution itself - Meghan has been lauded by BLM founder Opal Tometi and supporters including leading radical far-left US Democrats - but it was only possible with help from Harry's insider knowledge.

Any attempt to bring them back into the RF should be strongly resisted - Meghan did not get what she wanted - this time.

                                             --------------------------------------

Based upon that interview I would suggest that Harry's title should be changed from the "Duke" to "Dupe", as in "Dupe of ______" - but this is just my personal, humble opinion.

Tuesday 6th April 2021

China Capitalises on Capitalism

"China has announced it will cut business taxes by £61 billion over the  next year to stimulate economic growth as it seeks to recover from the  downturn caused by the pandemic."

"It should be a state of shame among Tories that the Chinese Communist  Party now shows better understanding of pro-growth tax policies than the  UK’s Conservative chancellor. China has reduced taxes and  administrative fees by more than ¥2.6 trillion last year – a record high  – coming after a ¥2.36 trillion tax slash in 2019." (link) 

We should wonder what Boris and Rishi are really thinking - when they appear to be following policies designed to punish the UK - rather than giving it a fighting chance to recover quickly.

Sunday 4th April 2021

Dystopian Britain

The take over of Britain by the Marxist Revolutionaries  is now gathering pace, under the BLM umbrella, as they  target our youngest children. 

The latest subversion of Britain's children for the radical left is labelled "Birth to 5 Matters".      

"Birth to 5 Matters: Non-statutory guidance for the Early Years Foundation Stage. Produced by the Early Years Coalition":

Comprising a group of trade union and charity activists including a representative from the National Education Union, Britain’s main teaching union.

It is clearly designed to stir-up racial prejudice between the minority ethnic and  the White majority populations in the UK - by indoctrinating our children with the idea of White Privilege. 

All of which are based upon the false narrative devised by the Marxists in their revolutionary playbook "Critical Theory".

This document and its divisive plans could have been produced by the propaganda departments of the Soviets or the Communist Chinese - or even introduced by Josef Goebbels himself if we substitute Semite for White.

We recently saw the effect of this kind of infiltration into our education system demonstrated at the Pimlico Academy - the "tip of the iceberg".

For example from page 25 of the document: 

"Instead of a colour-blind approach to race, more proactive anti-racism is needed". 

"Practitioner training is an important step toward opening dialogue and developing understanding about white privilege, systemic racism, and how racism affects children and families in early years settings". 

"... break down false assumptions about everyone being able to succeed on their merits, so that children recognise racist behaviours and develop anti-racist views". 

How is this any different to the marginalisation of the Jews by the NAZIS who ascribed to them all the wrongs in the world?

This is pernicious malfeasance on behalf of those in the field of education. It has no place in a civilised country.

This is not about bringing people together it is about creating hatred - as everything in Marxist "Critical Theory" -  is designed to do.

Saturday 3rd April 2021

BLM - Schools's Out!

The UK has just produced a well researched report about racism in Britain. based upon the real outcomes for people of different cultures and ethnic backgrounds in multicultural Britain. It was produced by a  multi-ethnic panel of 10 individuals including one White participant (link).

The 258-page report has been widely condemned, by Diane Abbott and Sadiq Khan,  and so has the panel leader, not questioning the report but his credentials - it appears though that many have not even read the report. The main conclusions from the report include: 

• Children from ethnic-minority communities did as well or better than white pupils in compulsory education, with black      Caribbean pupils the only group to perform less well.

• The pay gap between all ethnic minorities and the white majority population had shrunk to 2.3% overall and was barely significant for employees under 30.

• Diversity has increased in professions such as  law and medicine.

That does not exclude other measures of Racism - but whereas BLM and the opposition politicians and activists look for Racism itself everywhere - discrimination is outlawed in Britain and much work has been done to marginalise Racism in the UK. 

The claims of widespread Racism in Britain are inconsistent with the fact that it seems that everybody in the world is beating a path to the door of the UK to take advantage of what is on offer in terms of all measurable advantages.

Which includes greater legal protection for minorities than for the majority White population - courtesy of the Communist "New" Labour and its overtly biased Equalities Act (2010). 

Mass immigration is encouraged by the artful political left with a view to further diluting the White majority population who have given up on Marxists like Corbyn.

The other main country which is being unfairly targeted by the Marxist trained anti-White, anti-Capitalist, anti-Christian, anti-Heterosexual, anti-Monarchist, Feminist / Racist BLM is the USA which also has immigrants desperate to enter.

Despite what BLM would like everyone to believe the USA is another FREE country which many foreigners are willing to risk their lives in their attempts to try and get their families into - to improve their life chances.

Meanwhile, at the Pimlico Academy the children have reacted badly to being asked to have a thought for others when tying up their hair - so as to avoid blocking the view of some other pupils behind them. 

• The reaction was to hide behind the BLM narrative of Black Lives Matter - and scream 'Racism'! - as the excuse for their behaviour which involved:

• Calling out the Headmaster / School for Racism over its new dress code. 

• Complaining that they did not want to be taught about English Kings and Queens and 

• demanding that the Union Jack Flag be removed from the school. Which apparently had been burnt by pupils last September.

• Pimlico Academy was accused by its students of "racism, Islamophobia and transphobia, for introducing a uniform policy that discriminated against pupils with afros and hijabs".

The real irony is that BLM are encouraging Racist attack against the White majority for its own political ends. 

Pimlico Academy is one of many "Canary in the Coal mine" telling the White UK population what the BLM movement is really "up to" in our schools and has been documented on this site in an earlier articles - see below under "Curriculum Decolonisation" - a proposal for California (12th March 2021 article). 

This earlier article looks at what is proposed for the California Public Schools but not yet enacted - it gives a good idea of what is happening in our schools. For example:

• "The curriculum is based upon the 'pedagogy of the oppressed', developed by Marxist theoretician Paolo Freire, who argued that students must be educated about their oppression in order to attain 'critical consciousness' and, consequently, develop the capacity to overthrow their oppressors."

Or, as Lenin would have put it:

“Give me just one generation of youth, and I'll transform the whole world.”
― Vladimir Lenin

What is happening in the USA is being exposed by an investigative reporter in the USA Christopher Rufo (link) - who first highlighted the behaviour of BLM's "Diversity Trainers" in Seattle Washington in 2020 - and who also operate in the UK.

Minority British children are being turned against the White majority (86% England and Wales (2011)); against White Culture, History and Traditions and are being turned into a potential threat to the stability of the country. 

They have simply rejected education because it is easier to become BLM activists for "Social Justice" - aka troublemakers.

BLM is a fundamentally anti-White Racist movement determined to foment a Marxist Revolution in Britain and in the USA; 

In much the same way as Orwell outlined in "1984.":

• "The  old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice.  Ours (Marxism) is founded upon hatred. In our world, there will be no emotions  except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall  destroy – everything. 

• We have cut the  links between child and parent (attacks on the nuclear family), and between man and man (exploiting Racism / Sexuality), and between man and woman (exploiting Feminism, Misogyny, Misandry).  (Brackets added)

The British government are aware of what is happening in our schools and other public institutions e.g. National Trust - but it needs to be stopped and it hasn't been. 

The British opposition parties meanwhile can't wait to get involved in this new "Revolution" which they whole heartedly support - Sadiq Khan is falling over backwards to support the BLM's anti-White antics - as is Pres. Joe Biden and the Democrats in the USA who are also onside with BLM.

When BLM started out it published its true beliefs - but removed them from its website after it started to lose support - the original still exists online. 

The following link gives the explanation as to why BLM's "beliefs" webpage was removed and why BLM lost support after it was viewed by its former supporters - who then realised what BLM were really planning (link).

Which also includes abolishing the police and prisons.

A copy of the original deleted BLM webpage is available on request.

Monday 29th March 2021

Boris's Misguided Reviews

Almost everything that Boris has decided upon in his latest review - or should I say - what Carrie or Dominic have decided upon is misguided. 

Anyone watching could be forgiven for believing that the reviews are the work of some lunatic Leftie who hates Britain - and it is not just his latest review that is at fault. The three items below are interlinked:

China

If Boris thinks that the Chinese can be contained so that they will not present as a threat to the UK he is deluded. The Chinese are an existential threat to every country on the planet. It is rumoured that the Chinese Cyber unit alone has over 100,000 specialists interrogating (spying) on every aspect of the West. 

China will not have ignored the fact that they could break International Laws and Treaties by invading Hong Kong and get away without much of a murmur from the West. Except that Britain will take some Hong Kong residents to settle in the UK. 

This is as their own countrymen are subjugated using the same Maoist Cult derived techniques of control that are currently being used in the West (Marxist BLM + Antifa) - "Cancelling" and "Shaming" with a bit of coercion and threats of violence (BLM Militia) thrown in. 

The Chinese will be the ones who decide who can leave Hong Kong and live in Britain - not the British. 

Our Universities, professors, lecturers, scientists and engineers have been collaborating with the Chinese on practically every aspect of research and the only research that they are really interested in what they can use against the West.

Every Chinese company and their employees are required to spy on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and look for advantage for China (CCP).

China is operating throughout the world to build a new version of the British Colonial Empire - using Chinese bank loans to acquire strategic assets to be used by the Chinese military through debt defaults systems. 

These include naval ports and refuelling facilities in the Caribbean, Southeast Asia, South America, the EU and East Africa. They are also actively acquiring control of natural resources in Africa and other areas.

Following Nixon's visit to China in 1972 - the same year that the UK signed up to the EEC - "Common Market" (ECA(1972) / Treaty of Rome (1957) - the Chinese have successfully exploited the weaknesses of the Capitalist system - outsourcing, cheap labour and supply chains. Using "half-inched" technology from the West.  

Since that time it has out performed its competitors using Capitalism to  grow into the world's largest Economy and Military Power (not quite yet). 

The CCP has only embraced Capitalism as a means to an end - like the Russian Oligarchs - which idiot thought that by introducing China to the Capitalist system that they would bring them into the Capitalist fold? 

The Chinese have not moved an Angstrom's length from their firmly held beliefs based upon their mystical past and Maoism, China is also firmly wedded to Russia and the rest of the Communist world.  

It believes that it is written that China will rule over the Earth and near planets in the Universe - everything under the stars. They are about to make Mars a target for control and claim it for themselves. 

So, pray tell Dear Boris - what makes you think that you can control or contain the Chinese? 

The above is just a little snapshot of some of the ambitions that China has in mind - the Chinese population are already being prepped for conflict over Taiwan - and its people have high expectations. 

Covid-19 might not have escaped from the Wuhan laboratory, but it was dispersed through the Chinese Diaspora into the rest of the world with disinformation about its efficacy supplied by China and World Health Organisation. 

What a coincidence that the timing of its release coincided with the Presidential Election in the USA, the start of the UN's Agenda 21/30/50 and the rise of the Marxist BLM and Antifa in the UK. 

Defence

The defence of the UK has to be taken in conjunction with NATO allies and, in particular with the USA. Apparently, the USA and UK are behind where they should be in terms of upgrading their military because they have considered Russia to be the main threat - largely ignoring any threat from China or North Korea. 

Boris has increased the number of UK nuclear warheads with the threat to use them as a first strike option - even against non-nuclear targets?

But President Trump was the first US president in the last 49 years to see the danger that China represents not just to the USA but to the rest of the world. Which is why he was removed by the American Oligarchy. 

Now that Biden is in charge (with Obama and the far-left Democrats in the Senate / H of R looking over his shoulder) the picture has changed - it may change again if Harris takes over from Biden - if he becomes incapacitated. 

China will not now be seen as much of a threat as Biden reduces the US's ability to defend itself - by de-industrialising (Agenda 21), along with Germany and Britain while China  massively increases its economic and military prowess - and Russia starts to catch-up. 

On the face of it appears that our armed forces have been reduced in size, manpower and reach. Except in Space and Cyberspace - and this seems to have been confirmed to be the correct direction after a quick review by Cummings - who visited our military facilities. Others disagree and it remains to be seen how effective our military will be after these changes. (link) 

Now AI will take centre stage but what happens if the Chinese drones make  peace with UK military drones and they join forces against the West or they are "shamed" and "cancelled"? 

But it seems that nothing has been finalised about our military relationship with the EU - which allegedly Theresa May tied us into, in a secret deal - behind the back of Parliament and the British people. 

This could have left Britain effectively under Article 42.3 (TEU) of the Lisbon Treaty or some other Merkel designed EU device: 

• "Member States shall make civilian and military capabilities available to the Union for the implementation of the common security and defence policy, to contribute to the objectives defined by the Council. Those Member States which together establish multinational forces may also make them available to the common security and defence policy."

• "Member States shall undertake progressively to improve their military capabilities. The Agency in the field of defence capabilities development, research, acquisition and armaments (hereinafter referred to as ‘the European Defence Agency’) shall identify operational requirements, shall promote measures to satisfy those requirements, shall contribute to identifying and, where appropriate, implementing any measure needed to strengthen the industrial and technological base of the defence sector, shall participate in defining a European capabilities and armaments policy, and shall assist the Council in evaluating the improvement of military capabilities." 

Have we had to cut our defence forces in order to pay for the EU's defence? Will our AI missiles and drones be loyal to the UK or to the EU?

The latest information that I can find about the future relationship between the UK and EI regarding Defence (link). 

What is needed is for the British people to find out what it would cost them to collaborate with the EU on an ad hoc basis and on what terms and conditions - personally I believe that the UK should not collaborate on any military relationship controlled by the unelected EU. 

The fact that the UK is still attached to an invisible EU elastic constraint suggests that Boris may never have really been totally serious about the UK leaving the EU completely - or he his too distracted with other influences.

Any relationship with the EU's defence system by the UK should be avoided at all costs - it  would be setting a trap for the UK - either to keep us under the ECJ control or to drag us back under full control or force funding to subsidise Germany which won't pay its full fees into NATO. 

I would be grateful for the latest update on this topic and the likely costs if anyone knows. I have contacted Lord Frost to ask for guidance and await his reply.

This is as Merkel sidles up to Russia (Nordstream-2 Gas) and to China (on behalf of German motor industry) - as the West has its own personal transportation confiscated on the altar of the AGW fabrication.

Cummings would have done better to have concentrated on re-organising the Civil Service* to ensure that the country is protected from those who have loyalties that are contrary the best interests of the British people. Cummings was removed too early for that and the real  reasons for his removal will be of interest when it becomes exposed in detail.

*I refer to the civil servants who were in place following the reign of "new" Labour and subsequently - also known as the "Blair government in exile" - but that could equally relate to the influence of previous Conservative governments which simply followed Blair's example.

Defence Update - the CCP has just invaded the Whitsun Reef within the Philippine "exclusive economic zone" - this move is probably not an Ecology field trip.

Agenda 21

Boris's "New Deal" - the pointless and destructive EU's HS2 project and UK government interventions - is following the US Democrats's failed Franklin D. Roosevelt's  (1933-1945) "New Deal" version of the 1930s and 1940s. 

Apparently, this is to get Britain out of the economic decline that was precipitated by the "Wuhan Flu" but greatly exacerbated by the policies enacted by the government and its advisors. 

We should be aware that, under FDR:

• "Tax rates were hiked, which scooped capital out of investment and dumped it into dozens of hastily conceived government programs. Those programs quickly became politicized and produced unintended consequences, which plunged the American economy deeper into depression."

• "In 1939, after almost two full terms of Roosevelt and his New Deal, unemployment had not dropped, but had risen to 17.2 percent (from 16.3%)." (link)

Boris (Don Quixote) Johnson's UN "Green New Deal" is even worse - relying on magical windmill's to power the UK out of the crisis that was deliberately created - and will cost billions, if not trillions to enact - from UK taxpayers' / consumers'  pockets - as they freeze in their homes.

Just as Merkel has been been following the UN  Agenda 21 - which is allegedly "wasting" German consumers' money - €176 billion  between 2000 - 2016 were paid by electricity consumers to renewables companies, for electricity with a market value of just 5 billion euros - in its failed attempt to beat mother nature. Only to discover that Germany could not control the weather either (See Blog - "UK Energy Future - Do Not Follow Germany"  - on this website). 

Of course, that is not the only problem with windmill's. In the end Merkel decided to turn to those that she trusts - Putin and Russian gas. 

"In the US currently another (far-left) Democratic Pres. Biden is planning on spending $3 trillion on the 'new Green Agenda - infrastructure plan' - improving infrastructure, fighting climate change and reducing economic inequities" (link).

In the end though - Agenda 21 is using Climate Change as an excuse to bring the world's population under the control of a single government - the UN - which is now controlled by China (Chinese Communist Party). 

It has nothing to do with saving the planet from warming due to man-made CO2  - which is not the cause anyway see below:

China is the biggest producer of CO2 (28%),  USA (15%) the rest of the world (23%) Russia is the 4th largest producer of CO2 and, like China  does not believe in AGW, rather in natural cycles of  warming and cooling,

The CO2 is mainly produced through burning coal and oil - the CO2 was captured previously in earth's history through various natural means including plants, trees and in the world's Oceans. 

Chinese scientists consider that the earth naturally moves through cycles of glaciation and warming and that we are next in line for another cooling or glacial period - and not increased warming to a catastrophic level. 

As far as I can tell Greta Thunberg has not been to protest in China - she only seems to protest in and against the West - the USA in particular.

Without CO2 life on earth would not exist and reducing it below a minimum level would be catastrophic - yet some of the main stream protagonists against AGW such as Bill Gates have advocated for net zero CO2 emissions as the ideal.

But too much CO2 is not the problem - the problem is too little CO2 (link): 

• "Statistician Bjorn Lomborg had already pointed out that the Paris CO2 emission promises would cost $100 trillion dollars that no one has, and make only a 0.05 degree difference in Earth’s 2100 AD temperature. Others say perhaps a 0.2 degree C (0.3 degrees F) difference, and even that would hold only in the highly unlikely event that all parties actually kept their voluntary pledges."

• "During the last Ice Age too little CO2 almost eradicated mankind..." 

• "In fact, Earth’s atmosphere had only about 180 parts per million CO2, compared to today’s 400 ppm: 0.018% then versus 0.040% today."

• "When that Ice Age ended, moreover, CO2 changes didn’t lead the warming." 

• "The atmospheric CO2 only began to recover about 800 years after the warming started."

• "Carbon dioxide truly is “the gas of life.” The plants that feed us and wildlife can’t live without inhaling CO2, and then they exhale the oxygen that lets humans and animals keep breathing."

• "Our crop plants evolved about 400 million years ago, when CO2 in the atmosphere was about 5000 parts per million! Our evergreen trees and shrubs evolved about 360 million years ago, with CO2 levels at about 4,000 ppm. When our deciduous trees evolved about 160 million years ago, the CO2 level was about 2,200 ppm – still five times the current level."

• "The year 1936 recorded the hottest thermometer readings of any year in the last 5,000. However, these days NOAA reports only its 'adjusted' temperatures, which always seem to go only higher. In fact, the first surge of human-emitted carbon dioxide after World War II should have produced the biggest surge of warming – if CO2 is the control factor. Instead temperatures went down from 1940 to 1975."

So there you have it. The truth is that the Marxist supporters in the UK and in the US Democrats in the House of Representatives are facilitating the economic growth of China in conjunction with the economic decline of the West. 

Johnson and Sunak et al., in the UK  and Biden and the Democrats and big tech in the USA are deliberately ensuring that the West cannot compete with China and will become totally reliant on Chinese technology (nicked from the west) but manufactured cheaply in China using slave labour... (Allegedly)   

This is taking place under the cover of the Covid-19 pandemic which they keep trying to extend to reach their final goal - the slow death of western democracy and the impoverishment of the White western populations.

Giving rise to a Chinese dominated Communist Global Oligarchy and a surveillance society where 2 + 2 = 5 and the world's population is trapped in a 5G cage. 

Friday 19th March 2021

Marxists - Masters of Misdirection

The idea that Misogyny - "literally the hatred of women" should be classified as a thought crime and that every encounter between the sexes should be monitored by the Police is to set women against men and vice versa within society.  

But the real extent of such interactions is being deliberately over-exaggerated - not every man hates  every women and not every man attacks or humiliates or terrifies helpless women - but examples exist not just for Misogyny but also for Misandry.

It is also true that the way in which this so called "hatred" manifests itself is also different for men and women - both can be equally cruel, but in different ways, each is also capable of the destruction of the other. 

That is not a reason to place these actions under new hate crime legislation. They can all be treated individually under existing laws. 

Historically northern European men and probably many others are brought up to respect women, to cherish and to protect them. 

Most men that I know treat every woman with respect, as far as I am aware.  It is also true that many young men are very shy around girls and would blush if a girl even looked at him - equally they would be devastated if the girl put him down ("dissed him") especially in front of his friends. 

More importantly women normally (most often) bring up boys and girls - and instil in them respect for their parents, themselves, each other and other parents  - including mothers. 

At school which is also dominated by women teachers they are further taught to respect each other, even so no-one is perfect, and there are incidents where respect is lost - due to many varied circumstances - but to suggest that Misogyny is systemic is a gross misrepresentation of its true extent. 

When women wanted to work  or needed to work for economic reasons, and returned home tired, the parents had much less time to devote to the upbringing of the boys and girls. So school became more important in the upbringing of boys and girls. Women should be paid equally for the same work - the current situation is an iniquity.

Bringing up children as a lone parent is very much worse with, for example, errant fathers who decided not to stay with the family. This also leaves a family without a male role model and can lead lead to some boys to seeking other role models and becoming involved with gangs. 

As an antidote to gangs - the Scouts and Guides (including Brownies and Cubs) teach respect for every member of society - this is part of our Christian tradition. These clubs still exists though less is publicised about their activities it seems.

The worst influences on men and women though are the easy access to excessive drink, through supermarkets (Blair - new Labour), easy online gambling, drugs from gangs and online pornography - promoted and encouraged by the political Left . 

According to some Sunday papers the "Ladies" are just as likely to be lying drunk and half-naked in the gutter or fighting as the men are on Friday and Saturday night - the loss of self-respect does nothing to endear either sex.

Even worse was when the political Left (Fabian Society members) got their teeth into our education system in the 1960s it subsequently began the cultural changes to our norms that we experience today. 

The main target of the Marxist Left (Amoral Atheists) in our schools is the attacks against Christianity through denigration of the nuclear family and the teachings of Christ. Added to which was the destruction of trust between teachers and pupils; encouraging  the breakdown of respect and discipline more generally. 

The activities of the Left in breaking down Christian traditions are based upon the target areas found in the Marxist Frankfurt School "Critical Theory".

The theory was simple: "criticise every pillar of Western  culture—family, democracy, common law, freedom of speech, and the rest.  The hope was that these pillars would crumble under the pressure" (link). 

How to Take over Western Society 

Marxist "Critical Theory" is based literally on the applications of the works of Marx and Freud to creating the means to bring about a new 1917 Bolshevik style Revolution in the West (USA and UK +) by pitting various sections of society against each other - rather than only using "Class" differences - which "Privilege" now encompasses.

The original 1917 Russian Revolution was based upon "Class"antagonism in the early 1900s  (peasants against the Bourgeois) in a Feudal society - but it never reproduced the same effect in the West as it did in Russia.

These "Class" differences became less important as Capitalism lifted standards of living and created more opportunities for people to enrich their lives and increase leisure time. This was particularly the case in California in the USA in the 1960s - 1970s - it was also the time of the "Black Panthers" and the time of Mao's "Cultural Revolution" in China. 

We are now in the time of BLM and a new "Cultural Revolution" is in progress in the West - using the same "Cancelling" and "Shaming" techniques borrowed from the methods of control used by Cults. 

Mao used them then and the Chinese Communist  Party (CCP) is using them now in Hong Kong - to reprogram the population, following the CCP invasion.

Some of the Marxists from the Frankfurt School had made their home in California and continued their work of undermining the West - including Herbert Marcuse (link) (link).

"Critical Theory" enlists the use of other differences including Race, Gender, AGW, Privilege etc., into its repertoire of antagonisms. 

The application of Critical Theory  is dispersed through such subversive subjects as "Whiteness studies", "Black Studies", Asian Studies, Queer Studies etc. - which denigrates "Whiteness" and lauds "Blackness "etc.. 

This misdirection leads to the dystopian notion that only White people can be Racist - and even if they were't they had Privilege - so there was always something to use to condemn White people and to incite hatred.

In truth though this is not really about anything other than the Marxist  activists creating antagonism in society - as widely as possible. 

At the present time Sarah Everard it is being used by - the political left BLM and Antifa who attended the vigil - to create antagonism between men and women in general in western society.

Of course, different cultures have different norms where women are systemically viewed as second class citizens or simply chattels - perhaps that should be outlawed in Britain or is it OK in a modern Woke society? 

It is certainly contrary to the tenets of Feminism - which can only be seen as a rather hypocritical movement which is very selective about whom it targets.

The most astonishing thing about Feminism is that it is only seems to be against the English population who do not in general subjugate women - and it never suggests that it should be applied to those who actually do really subjugate women - systemically. 

This shows that Feminism is really just about controlling the Christian  (or other northern European) male populations - Feminism is simply Misandry against the white population. 

Why Create Antagonism between men and women in Society?

What Britain is experiencing following the murder of Sarah Everard - the call for misogyny to be make a "hate crime" is being encouraged and promoted by BLM and Antifa. 

Black Lives Matter was founded in July 2013, when George Zimmerman, 28 was found not guilty of murder of Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old black high school student, in Sanford, Florida in 2012. 

BLM received a $100 million donation (BLM's donations are not taxed) from the far-Left Ford Foundation - for more about the Ford foundation please see the Blog about the Ford Foundation on this website.

However, BLM are not just interested in Racial antagonism - the horrific death of George Floyd has brought further millions of tax free $'s for BLM to expand its Marxist activism. 

BLM's three founders are Black Lesbians and Gender antagonism - turning women against men - is also high on BLM's "to do list" of antagonisms to exploit on route to the "new Bolshevik Revolution" in the USA and UK, initially - following the vigil for Sarah.  Needless to say BLM are against the Patriarchal society in the West.

Actually, BLM have been very specific about what its motives are and promoting Racism against white people is only a part of its agenda - do not fall for its misdirection:

• BLM's leaders openly admit that they want to abolish the nuclear family, police, prisons and capitalism.
• For more on BLM (link) (link)

For some assessments of BLM from other Black people (link)

Tuesday 16th March 2021

Selective Policing (Updated)

Reports in the Press today claim that last night's Sarah Everard Vigil was highjacked by Antifa, BLM and Extinction Rebellion activists abusing the police. Shouting "F***" the Police and "Kill the Bill". (link)

Monday 15th March 2021 (Ides of March)

Selective Policing

We thought that we had escaped from the Totalitarian future that the EU has always represented  - that was until the "Wuhan Virus" took hold in Britain in March 2020 and the new Conservative government showed its true anti-Democratic credentials. 

That was when it enacted panicked measures - panicked by Professor Lockdown - the powers of a newly formed Totalitarian state. Powers that it plans to extend in further in newly rushed legislation debated today and tomorrow, to increase its grip on power without Parliamentary oversight. 

Even at this stage Boris is guilty of the very worst forms of social control ever enforced on the UK population - reminiscent of Communist China; in fact, practically copied from the CCP. 

Worse still is that it was mostly unnecessary since the UK population (1) trusted the government and its scientific advisors and (2) were willing to accept even severe restriction voluntarily in a spirit of cooperations and for the protection of others; and their kith and kin.  

But was it really panic or something more sinister. The idea of corralling an entire population under state control and incarcerating them for periods determined by fear based upon the projections from statistics based graphs and the ability of the NHS to cope? 

The numbers of deaths have been wildly over-exaggerated by counting multiples deaths which had nothing to do with Covid-19. Worse still 99% of the "locked down" population have been shown to simply "shrug" off the virus with little adverse effect. 

This wasn't even the original 2009 Pandemic contingency plan - it was an experiment based upon the methods used by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) - which was initially dismissed as "impossible in a western Democracy" - until it was implemented in Italy. That is when Prof. Ferguson realised that it might work in the UK as well.

There was no reliable scientific basis for the lockdown of the general population - the data from China was always suspect and what idiot would use it to imprison the entire UK population. That is unless it would be used to bring in the necessary controls for the bigger project -UN Agenda 21 - behind the scenes.

UN Agenda 21 

Number 10  would like us all to believe that the UK's "Green Agenda" was Carrie Symonds' idea - but Wind-Turbines and Photo-Voltaic arrays are only part of the UN's bigger plan which involves controlling every aspect the lives of everyone on the planet - under a single government - currently Communist China controls the UN. 

Biden was placed into power to fulfill the UN plan in the USA, Trump would have refused - the reason he was removed -  Biden though was "hot to trot" when it comes to Executive Orders (42 in quick succession as soon as he was inaugurated - directed towards Agenda 21 - well it is 2021 after all.

But President Biden is not the only one who has been busy  on preparing legislation, infrastructure and new policy measures. Behind our backs in the UK - Sadiq Khan is the most obvious and notable. The current illegal Mayor of London has been busy trying to get rid of cars by blocking roads and implementing higher charges. 

Boris is now planning to block our roads with electric and hydrogen fuel powered buses. 

All or most local governments are probably also at it - but you might not see all of it until after the Pandemic is declared ended or at least has diminished its deadly "aura of fear". 

Also behind our backs our Institutions of State are being taken over by Maoist BLM and controlling the social narrative - and who are brainwashing our children for the Dystopian future where History has been altered in a tribute to Orwell's 1984". 

Fabian Society member Khan is, along with many other local councils are actively helping BLM.  Khan is in good company along with Blair and  Brown and a couple of hundred  other parliamentarians including at the core of the Labour Party - Obama is also a Fabian member.

The Fabian Society has been advocating for world government for many years.

In real terms implementing Agenda 21 means getting to net zero Carbon Dioxide or close to it to stop the "pretend CO2 heating". Although a Global pandemic might have been a good reason to implement world government - AGW has always been considered the best way to bring about world Communist rule. Because that is the only way of forcing people to give up their freedom in the longer term (their Cars in particular). 

CO2 is a very much less potent "greenhouse gas" than water vapour in retaining the Earth's heat. More importantly - heating always comes before CO2 increases in the Geological record - not the other way around (ice core data). So CO2 is not causing the Global warming - which is naturally cyclical.

The UN Agenda 21 plan is based around the following relationship which was displayed by Bill Gates at the 2010 TED talk on climate change:

                                      CO2 = P x S x E x C

For CO2 to fall to, or near to net zero either P or S or E or C has to fall close to zero.

Where P = People, S = Services per person (average), E = Energy use per service (average) and C = CO2 per unit of Energy unit.

To carry out this mass population control the populations will be herded into "Smart Cities" under constant surveillance. Britain is supposedly a "free country" but thanks to New Labour it is one of the most monitored in the world already. 

The countryside will be re-wilded and private land will be off-limits - the "elites" will own everything. The general population will not own anything but their basic needs will be catered for- they will simply be consumers. This is the "Great Reset" - an Oligarchy in the making.

Chosen companies will be publicly supported for "Sustainable Development". Power, water and heating usage will be drastically reduced to stop so-called CO2 pollution. 

Taxation, fees and regulations will all be increased and the population will be gradually reduced medically. 

Bureaucracies will make decisions outside of the Democratic process - decisions will be only for the common good not for individuals.

This is what Agenda 21 is all about and our politicians are all tied into it - ready and willing to control their populations for the greater good!

Forget about Democracy - it already died with the Covid-19 pandemic.

Selective Policing

Back to the present: the behaviour of the Police strong-arming female protestors seething from the lack of police on the streets protecting the public from attacks in a city of with out of control crime. The formerly elected Mayor (Khan) shows little interest in the people of London - except when it's election time.. 

This contrasts markedly with the disgusting overt Police support for the Marxist BLM and Extinction Rebellion - even under the same Covid-19 restrictions. 

There is clearly one rule for one section of society and other for those who are not radical-left political activists as it appears some Police are onside. 

The current new legislation programme extending the powers of what is rapidly becoming a Police State seeks only ever more control over the everyday lives of British Citizens is an abomination. 

The government should think long and hard about how it treats its citizens - all of them, not just those with a favoured anti-white alien political agenda.

The question must now be are we seeing the beginning of extended lockdowns long into the future, under the pretext of ever new virus mutations? 

Is this legislation simply to hide the changes that are taking place as we transition into a new Communist Dystopia in Britain - the UN's Agenda 21.

Friday 12th March 2021

Curriculum "Decolonisation"

Here is a taste of what to expect if it is not stopped in British schools, Colleges and Universities - and which is being promoted by the Labour Party and other radical left-wing antagonists who support BLM. 

"Next week, the California Department of Education will vote on a new statewide ethnic studies curriculum that advocates for the 'decolonization' of American society and elevates Aztec religious symbolism—all in the service of a left-wing political ideology." 

(Clearly, the Aztec's are less directly relevant to any historical argument against Britain or the English - the Spanish are believed to have brought disease to which the natives were not immune. This resulted in the deaths of 80% of the population to which they had no immunity (link). In Britain its Empire and Commonwealth is the target of BLM activists infiltrating our education system).

"The new program (in California), called the Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum..., is targeted at the primary and secondary public school system... comprising 10, 000 schools serving 6 million students."

"The curriculum is based upon the 'pedagogy of the oppressed', developed by Marxist theoretician Paolo Freire, who argued that students must be educated about their oppression in order to attain 'critical consciousness' and, consequently, develop the capacity to overthrow their oppressors."

Teachers are instructed to assist in the students challenge the existing society in order to "inspire their pupils to participate in 'social movements that struggle for social justice' and 'build new possibilities for a post-racist, post-systemic racism society.'”

"R. Tolteka Cuauhtin, the original co-chair of the Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum, developed much of the material regarding early American history. He is a Teacher, Governing Council Vice-Chair, and Advisory Lead Social Justice Humanities Academy at Cesar Chavez Learning Academies." argues that:  

• "... the United States was founded on 'Eurocentric, white supremacist (racist, anti-Black, anti-Indigenous), capitalist (classist), patriarchal (sexist and misogynistic), heteropatriarchal (homophobic), and anthropocentric paradigm brought from Europe.' ... and that "Whites established a 'hegemony' that continues to the present day, in which minorities are subjected to 'socialization, domestication, and ‘zombification.'”

• Going  further he also claims: "that white Christians committed 'theocide' against indigenous tribes, killing their gods and replacing them with Christianity." 

• "White settlers thus established a regime of 'coloniality, dehumanization, and genocide,' characterized by the 'explicit erasure and replacement of holistic Indigeneity and humanity.'"

• "The solution, according to Cuauhtin and the ethnic studies curriculum, is to 'name, speak to, resist, and transform the hegemonic Eurocentric neocolonial condition' in a posture of 'transformational resistance.'” 

"The ultimate goal is to 'decolonize' American society and establish a new regime of 'countergenocide' and 'counterhegemony,' which will displace white Christian culture and lead to the 'regeneration of indigenous epistemic and cultural futurity.'”

• "The curriculum recommends that teachers lead their students in a series of indigenous songs, chants, and affirmations, including the 'In Lak Ech Affirmation,' which appeals directly to the Aztec gods. Students first clap and chant to the god Tezkatlipoka—whom the Aztecs traditionally worshipped with human sacrifice and cannibalism—asking him for the power to be 'warriors' for 'social justice'".

"Finally, the chant comes to a climax with a request for 'liberation, transformation, [and] decolonization,' after which students shout 'Panche beh! Panche beh!' in pursuit of ultimate 'critical consciousness.'”

"California parents should be concerned. Under the guise of 'equity' and 'empowerment,' activists within the public education system have developed this radical new curriculum in order to transform California schools into factories for left-wing political activism. They have recast the United States as an oppressor nation that must be deconstructed and subverted throu

Monday 25th  January 2021

Biden's Extremist Agenda

A fascinating article entitled "Biden's Culture War Aggression" by Andrew Sullivan published on the Guido Fawkes website yesterday - much was revealed about Joe Biden and some were entirely expected (Article link).

"On immigration, he is way to Obama’s left, proposing a mass amnesty of millions of illegal immigrants, a complete moratorium on deportations, and immediate revocation of the bogus emergency order that allowed Trump to bypass Congress and spend money building his wall."  

Not a big surprise - apart from its enormous implications for the USA. 

But how does this fit with his theme of "unity" espoused in at his inauguration speech on the 20th of January 2021? This move  implies no restrictions whatsoever for mass immigration into the USA - which will lead to resentment by many Americans that they will become sidelined and see their country changed beyond recognition.

But there is very much worse to follow, assuming you are not on the extreme of politics in the US:

"The vast majority of Americans support laws that protect minorities from discrimination, so that every American can have equality of opportunity, without their own talents being held back by prejudice. 

But Biden’s speech and executive orders come from a very different place. 

They explicitly replace the idea of equality in favor of what anti-liberal critical theorists call “equity.” They junk equality of opportunity in favor of equality of outcomes. Most people won’t notice that this new concept has been introduced — equity, equality, it all sounds the same — but they’ll soon find out the difference."

"...equity means giving the named identity groups a specific advantage in treatment by the federal government over other groups — in order to make up for historic injustice and “systemic” oppression. 

Without “equity”, the argument runs, there can be no real “equality of opportunity.” Equity therefore comes first. Until equity is reached, equality is postponed — perhaps for ever."

The government can spend money, time and effort moving towards equality - but that would not give "equity" to the citizens, viz.

" ...that would not reflect critical theory’s insistence that race and identity trump class, and that America itself is inherently, from top to bottom, a “white supremacist” country. Biden just endorsed that with gusto."

"Equity", as far as Marxist "Critical Theory" is concerned, simply means that the various groups of people (identities) cannot be treated equally without first achieving "Equity". 

In other words - it is necessary to reverse the order in society so that the minorities take over. Effectively, it means removing  all the privileges from those who have them and handing them over to those who don't (except, of course, for those in positions of power in the USA - the corporate giants and government officials) - in other words Biden is fomenting insurrection.

The net result: "America is no longer about individual freedom; it’s about identity group power, and its constant management by government."

Now consider this:

 "Biden’s executive order on “LGBTQ+” is also taken directly from critical gender and queer theory. Take the trans question. Most decent people support laws that protect transgender people from discrimination — which, after the Bostock decision (Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020) is already the law of the land.

But this is not enough for Biden. He takes the view that the law should go further and insist that trans women are absolutely indistinguishable from biological women — which erases any means of enforcing laws that defend biological women as a class. If your sex is merely what you say it is, without any reference to biological reality, then it is no longer sex at all. It’s gender, period. It’s socially constructed all the way down."

In his inurgural speech: "Biden boldly asked us to be against “anger, resentment, hatred, extremism, lawlessness, violence, disease, joblessness and hopelessness,” and to reaffirm the “history, faith and reason” that provides unity."

But Biden's actions so far are provocative and divisive - deliberately setting different groups against each other - which is the sole purpose of Marxist  "Critical Theory"

One more point from Sullivan's article - "Biden’s woke rampage in the federal government won’t last, because it cannot last if our constitution means anything. So let the lawsuits commence as Biden alienates and inflames his moderate supporters and snubs practices that most Americans take as common sense."

Basically, this is little different from what Trotskyite Blair and Communist "New" Labour attempted in the UK between 1997 and 2010.

George Orwell in "1984" stated the end goals of Marxism

"The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world, there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy – everything. Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between child and parent, and between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future, there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed."

God save America from the wrath of the far-left Democrat zealots.

Wednesday 13th January

Nancy Pelosi Displays her Inner Marxist

She could be the spokesperson for BLM she is so adept at espousing its real values: 

"Pelosi and McGovern Unveil Details of Rules Package for the 117th Congress - Includes sweeping ethics reforms, increases accountability for the American people, and makes this House of Representatives the most inclusive in history"

"It would include a “Select Committee on Economic Disparity and Fairness in Growth,” which would require Congress to 'hono(u)r all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender neutral'.” 

"In clause 8(c)(3) of rule XXIII, gendered terms, such as 'father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandson, or granddaughter; would be removed."

"In their place, terms such as 'parent, child, sibling, parent’s sibling, first cousin, sibling’s child, spouse, parent-in-law, child-in-law, sibling-in-law, stepparent, stepchild, step(-)sibling, half-sibling, or grandchild' will be used, instead." (link)

To reinforce her Marxist credentials and illustrate how well versed Pelosi is in the Frankfurt School's "Critical Theory" -  Pelosi stated that the "rioters" at the Capitol "chose their "whiteness" over democracy." (link)

Perhaps Nancy Pelosi might consider the fact that allegations of Election Fraud were only ever dismissed and not satisfactorily investigated in the eyes of a large group of voters. 

That was the reason for the reactions of those voters who had previously trusted the system to be fair, honest and robust - only to discover that such was not the case. 

That would have been a far less divisive response than promoting politically far-left insults aimed at the majority of the American population. 

In terms of rhetoric surrounding the description of actions taken by Trump supporters versus supporters of Biden - BLM and Antifa - whose out of control rioting was portrayed as peaceful protest by Biden and Harris - even as honest reporters provided more than sufficient evidence to the contrary. 

But since Marxism actually promotes the use of deception to further its ambitions - for the leftwing politicians, it is par for the course.
Donald Trump did not incite insurrection - that behaviour is a favourite of the political left (BLM / Antifa etc.) who have been rioting in US Democrat Cities under the auspices of Democrat Mayors during 2020 - not those on the Conservative side. 

He did not do anything which would contravene the US Constitution and the Senate's revenge attacks are only because Trump sidelined  Hillary Clinton in 2016. 

That prevented the political Left from turning the USA into a Communist Dystopia - at least for 4 years - and should be applauded, not condemned.   

Any new administration should try to bring the country together - not cast the opposition as anti-Democratic - as any tinpot despot would do - when that is clearly the wrong direction for such an epithet.
Impeaching Donald Trump would be seen as an attack on the majority of Americans by a bigoted US Senate that does not represent the American people.

1st January 2021

A Very British Revolution ...

Finally, we have taken control of our own destiny after 47 years under the yoke of the EEC(EU) - placed in that position by the hands of our elected representatives. Those who seek only power, wealth and self-aggrandisement as they sell out our country for personal gain.

We have broken free from EU legal control and we can finally determine our own destiny - but must be ever wary of forces acting to reverse the decision and send us back into oblivion at the hands of those who despise Democracy, personal responsibility and free speech. Those who wish to take away our identity, freedom, borders, traditions, religion and heritage along with the right to determine our own future in the wider world.

Unfortunately, it has not yet been possible to take back all of what is our birthright - our sovereign coastal waters and fishing grounds for a further 5 1/2 years. These sovereign territories were given away without the consent of the British people, a giveaway that was hidden from public scrutiny for 20 years, only exposed after the EU caused the UK to change an act of Parliament in favour of foreign fishing interests following the "Factortame" cases in 1990 and 1991. 

The Conservative Prime Minister Edward Heath, (with the help of Labour Party backing in 1972) signed away Britain's sovereignty - an abject betrayal by any measure. 

The true nature of the new relationship was contained in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office report advising Ministers of the results of joining the "Common Market" (FCO:30/1048) but it was 'classified' and held secret for 30 years - only released in the early 2000s.

As a result of the vote to leave the EU by a margin of 52% to 48% - David Cameron resigned on the day after the EU Referendum on June 24th 2016 to be replaced by Theresa May in July 2016. 

May worked with the EU's Angela Merkel in her Berlin office in 2018 to devise a plan to thwart any escape attempt by the UK by agreeing a Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration (WAPD) - which would replace the original Treaty signed by Heath in 1972 - and retain full EU control over the British people in perpetuity. 

In particular, it gave the EU the right to block the UK from leaving without its permission - using the "Irish Backstop" as the means.

Theresa May resigned on May 24th 2019 - replaced by Boris Johnson on July 24th 2019 after she failed to get her WAPD through Parliament.

Boris went on to win the next General Election with an 80 seat majority on the 12th December 2019. He had switched attention to the Political Declaration (PD) part of the WAPD and the future trading and security relationship with the EU. 

The WAPD Treaty was ratified based upon the fact that a new negotiated trade deal would result from the negotiations but the EU would not allow any changes to the original that had been agreed between Merkel and May. 

The "core" part of the WA had been forced through May's Cabinet at a meeting at Chequers on the 12th July 2018 and contained the following as listed by Facts4EU (link);

• "Leaving in name only on 29 March 2019" (BRINO)
• “An economic and a security partnership with the EU”
• “The establishment by the UK and the EU of a free trade area for goods”
• “to commit by treaty to ongoing harmonisation with EU rules on goods, including agri-food”
• “The UK would commit to apply a common rulebook on state aid”
• “agree to maintain high regulatory standards for the environment, climate change, social and employment, and consumer protection”
• “due regard paid to EU case law in areas where the UK continued to apply a common rulebook”
• “the phased introduction of a new Facilitated Customs Arrangement that would remove the need for customs checks and controls between the UK and the EU as if a combined customs territory”
• “apply the UK’s tariffs and trade policy for goods intended for the UK, and the EU’s tariffs and trade policy for goods intended for the EU”
• “include a mobility framework so that UK and EU citizens can continue to travel to each other’s territories”

So much for May's "Brexit means Brexit" the loss of 2 years to pretence and faux negotiations with the EU - See link above for Facts4EU's summary of the Ollie Robbins Remain version of the Chequer's agreement presented at Chequers - the one being worked on by the department for "Exiting the EU" was ignored.

In response; Brexit Secretary David Davis, Brexit Minister Steve Baker, and Boris Johnson, Foreign Secretary resigned.

Boris Johnson's newly elected government passed the Withdrawal Agreement Bill on the 20th December 2019 leading to the UK leaving the EU on the 31st of January 2019 and beginning the Transition Period, which ended at 11PM on the 31st December 2020.  

 
The trade and security talks between the UK under Boris Johnson and the EU related to the WAPD were to be conducted during the one Year Transition Period (TP) - (Theresa May had wanted a longer period). 

Ostensibly, the TP was designed as a period when businesses etc., would prepare for readiness to the new arrangements - in reality they are little more than a way of extending UK payments into the EU's coffers. 

May's intervention therefore simply frustrated attempts and delayed the UK leaving the control of the EU. Ensuring continuing payments from the UK into the coffers of the EU.  

Once within the Transition Period the UK would not have any access or rights to the day-to-day involvement in the EU and must comply with any new laws passed by the EU in the absence of the UK - effectively this was simply "taxation without representation".

On the 31st of January 2020 the UK repealed ECA (1972) - the European Communities Act (1972) which had taken the UK into the "Common Market" on the 1st January 1973.
The repeal ended all Treaty obligations undertaken by the UK to the EU - apart from Theresa May's WAPD Treaty which was required in order to develop any security and free trade arrangement with the EU (due to Merkel's obstinance). 

But because the WAPD had been ratified that meant that the 'Irish Backstop" (IB) was still a problem - effectively replacing the repeal of ECA (1972) with a new UK-EU Treaty - a new "trapping" Treaty - courtesy of May and Merkel.

Boris tried to get rid of the (IB) by introducing a Bill - the "Internal Markets Bill" - which was designed to make Northern Ireland a part of the newly sovereign UK internal Market, thereby removing the IB.

This was blocked by the House of Lords - which contains a majority of Peers (600 out of  830) either ennobled by Cameron or Blair - for the express purpose of blocking "Brexit".

For purely political reasons the elements of "Internal Markets Bill" pertaining to the Irish Border were designated as a breach of International law by opposition parties - since, they claimed, it would breach the WAPD Treaty that had already been ratified. 

In fact, the entire issue with the Irish Border is grossly "over-egged" by claiming that it breached the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) which actually  gave unfair advantage to IRA terrorists (get out of jail free cards) over British troops (who can be prosecuted) - and resulted in the removal of the militarised border between NI and Eire.

Against the above background Boris played a major role in the direct negotiations with Ursula Von Der Leyen and Angela Merkel through telephone links - with the results that Britain has regained its sovereignty but the UK is still tied to "Mutti's" (Merkel's) apron strings in many areas - because of Theresa May doing everything in her power to stop the UK leaving the EU.

Briefings for Brexit has produced a succinct summary of the outcome of the negotiations: For full list please follow the link (link)

• "The restoration of democratic national sovereignty
• The end to the legal ascendency of EU law over British law
• A  break with the secretive, technocratic and anti-democratic  decision-making of the EU, and that expensive fig-leaf of democracy the  EU parliament" 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

• "Autonomy for UK courts, and the end to oversight by the overtly integrationist and juridically-unsound CJEU
• Autonomy over the defence and intelligence concerns fundamental to a sovereign country"
• A closer relationship with our allies in the English-speaking world" 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

• "An immigration policy which can draw from a wide pool of talented individuals from across the world
• Lower migration will ease the housing shortage, leading eventually to  house prices lower than they would otherwise have been and improving access of young people to home ownership
• The Turing scheme supporting placements for 35,000 UK students globally  (versus Erasmus which sends to the EU only), aimed at students from  disadvantaged backgrounds who benefited little from Erasmus"

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

• "84 billion euros saved which we would otherwise have contributed to the next EU budget round (Commission figures)
• Immunity from the budgetary consequences of any future Eurozone debt crisis
• State aid no longer under EU law"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

• "Trade deals with developing nations, boosting Britain’s relations with high-growth regions of the globeTrade deals with developing nations, boosting Britain’s relations with  high-growth regions of the globe, and compensating for the relative  decline in Europe’s economic weight and China’s aggressive policies of  investment in Africa and elsewhere".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

• "Freedom from restrictive and anti-competitive European regulations which threaten Britain’s flourishing tech industry".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

• "The end of the EU Common Agricultural Policy allows the UK to focus its  subsidy regime for farmers on environmental and conservation concerns as  well as food production"
• A ban on transportation of live animals to the continent ((unfortunately except from Northern Ireland)
• The power to ban electric pulse fishing and factory trawlers to conserve our marine environment
• The ability to run our own marine protected areas (thanks to Greenpeace for drawing our attention to this point)

Overall, Boris and Lord Frost together with the rest of the British negotiating team have done a brilliant job in the most restrictive circumstances and against all the odds.

A truly British revolution - ready to throw off the burdens and handicaps that the EU represents and trade with the world - to invent, innovate and inspire.

Well Done.

27th December 2020

Boris's UK-EU Agreement - A preliminary look - more later

Britain is still not free of the EU - its fishing grounds are still occupied by a foreign power. Apparently, we can have them back in 5 1/2 years time if there is anything left after they have been ravaged by EU pirates.

That is a 4/10 for Boris on fishing, but in fairness he has made some notable gains and he has at least listened to the concerns of the British people regarding trading worldwide; ending ECJ jurisdiction; removing some of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) more onerous rules; and gaining tariff and quota free access to the EU.

Northern Ireland is now part of the EU under its Laws and Regulations.
At least we can trade with whomsoever we like, as long as we follow EU rules on competition and do not accelerate away from them economically or basically anything else they do not like. 

If they suspect that we are doing that then they can cry "Foul" and send us to an international arbitration panel of independent arbitrators! As an antidote, the agreement can be annulled within the first year if suitable grounds exist.

It has also been stated that the rules for this new agreement are under International jurisdiction, not under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and that the ECJ will not have any jurisdiction over the UK?

It has also been stated that the British Laws will, from now on, only be made in Parliament by elected British politicians - but we always believed (until recently) that such was the case and we were lied to over the past 47 years (as of the 1st Jan 2021) - so if the statement is true then its a cautious 9/10 for Boris and Lord Frost.

Theresa May's Withdrawal Agreement and Declaration is still in place with all its "Elephant Traps" and restrictions because it was very carefully crafted by May and Merkel in Merkel's private office in the Summer of 2018 to be (a) practically impossible escape from and (b) contained large numbers of UK commitments to the EU hidden within its texts. 

It was forced past her Cabinet at Chequers by all accounts using  intimidation. They were not even given the full documentation, or even the correct documentation, nor time to digest what was available.  See "Lawyers for Britain" assessment of the Merkel - May Withdrawal Agreement and how to move on from it (link).

What was available at the meeting at Chequers was described by Boris as a "turd" - yet it is still part of the current package.

Theresa May was unable to get the WA and PD ratified by Parliament and she was replaced.

The newly elected PM, Boris Johnson got it ratified by Parliament after negotiations with the EU offered a route to a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the EU - but the Irish Border problem (IB) remained.

Boris tried to get rid of the IB after he obtained an 80 seat majority in the December 2019 general Election with the introduction of the Internal Markets Bill. Boris was accused of breaking International Law in a ploy to stop him continuing - (in reality, it was an entirely political matter). The House of Lords voted against the Bill. It was never ratified, and during the negotiations in 2020 Boris dropped it altogether. 

Later towards the end of the negotiations Michael Gove announced that an EU representative (a Vet) would be in place in Northern Ireland - effectively the EU annexed northern Ireland and Boris did not fight the move in Parliament - instead he later abandoned the Internal Markets Bill.

Cautions: When Theresa May entered into negotiations there was a lot of to-ing and fro-ing after initial stalling before Article 50 was finally submitted - but the deal was finally put together in private with Angela Merkel in Berlin.

Boris concluded this new agreement in a similar manner which ended with private telephone communications with Angela Merkel via Ursula von der Leyen. I did warn about this after comparing behaviour with Theresa May's in the final stages of her negotiations. 

May's behaviour at Chequers appeared out of character, as if she had been given advice on how to present the Treaty to her Cabinet - but not as bizarre as her behaviour at the Conservative Party Conference.

The EU has not "changed its spots" it will not do so for as long as Angela Merkel is in power - and probably never.  

The EU is not doing the UK any favours - it has been backed into corner - the only reason for this apparent acceptance by the EU (actual details unknown until fully scrutinised) is that Boris gained such a large majority for leaving the EU - meaning that the EU support in our Parliament (Commons) has been effectively neutralised.

Presenting these deals (Treaties) close to holiday periods when less attention is available from MPs and Peers is not unprecedented by parties acting in the interests of the EU - equally it is a common practice to countdown the clock to pressurise any supplicant Member State.  

The one years notice to quit this Agreement might be to encourage a quick return of the UK to the fold - particularly if the EU (or France)  plays "hardball" and makes life difficult for the UK. But that would still leave the UK trapped in the Merkel-May WA and PD which Parliament ratified on route to this Agreement. 

Nothing has been specified about May's secret deals on Defence with the EU - or the EU Army - this should be out in the open and include a statement that: 

The UK armed forces will not be part of any EU armed force which swears an "oath of allegiance" to the EU or any of its leaders or fund, in any way an EU armed force (which goes appear to have been hidden within the texts (subsequently discovered in the small print).

24th December 2020
Deal or Not?
Nothing yet finalised as the EU holds off on fish quotas. Updates later if possible.

23rd December 2020
The EU Blockades the UK

As we approach the end of the "Transition Period" this kind of behaviour is inevitable - as are all the negative comments at home and abroad. Once again the Chinese virus suddenly erupts into a "more dangerous" form - at the same time as the NHS calls for an extension to the Transition. 

However, this was entirely predictable, once I discovered that Professor Lockdown became involved with New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (NERVTAG) and epidemiology took over from Biology:

Or as the Lockdown Sceptics website (link) puts it "Professor Lockdown strikes again."

"David Bonsal of Oxford Viromics wrote a Twitter thread yesterday that essentially cast doubt on NERVTAG’s conclusion that the new variant is more infectious. His conclusion: “Further work is needed to investigate any potential causal link between infection with this new variant and higher viral loads, and whether this results in higher transmissibility, severity of infection, or affects relative rates of symptomatic and asymptomatic infection.”

"The bottom line is that the alleged higher transmissibility of the new variant is an inference from Neil Ferguson’s epidemiological modelling and not based on any biological data. It’s just one theory among many as to why cases are increasing in London’s outer boroughs and Kent and far from the most plausible." An updated version of our report, investigating an association between SARS-COV-2 viral load and mutations associated with the new U.K. variant is linked here. https://t.co/UvNhqdPvkN— David Bonsall (@OxfordViromics) December 22, 2020

The 'new' Covid-19 variant VUI-202012/01 or B117 was first recognised in October, from UK samples collected in September 2020. It was later today linked to South Africa.
Lockdown Sceptics added, from the Mail:  "Despite an explosion in infections in October, PHE did not alert the Government or its scientists to the mutated strain’s existence until December, by which point more than 1,100 people were confirmed to have had the new version of the virus." 

Interestingly, the same Covid-19 variant was recorded in Denmark and the Netherlands but their borders were not closed - why would the other EU internal borders remain open when the only other border - to Britain is closed - unless it is related to punishing the British people?
Before answering it must be noted from the South China News (link) that:

• "The genetic mutation is probably more easily transmitted than earlier strains prompting a UK travel ban in dozens of countries" 

Note it is not a "strain" - it is just a variant, a mutant of the original and there are many others

• "But so far there is no evidence to suggest it is more deadly and scientists are hopeful that vaccines will still work"

It is more than hopeful at this stage but Biology must now take over from Mathematics, (Statistics) which as we all know we should be wary of "Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics".

Also, we should remember that the original COVID-19 that was released from China after Wuhan International Airport was left open for about a month following the announcement of the virus spreading in Wuhan Province, and, allegedly, that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), with the help of the W.H.O., had initially requested other countries not to close their borders since the virus was not transmissible between people. 

Covid-19 has been mutating all the while that it has been travelling around the world through the Chinese Diaspora spurred by Globalisation. Such mutations are not unusual and not usually deadly.

The presence of Covid-19 within the EU populations has been advantageous for the EU in these negotiations in some important respects, despite its collateral damage - by allowing a cover for the ramping up of the attacks on the UK, a country which is already economically weakened by the same virus.

This lack of empathy within the EU towards another EU Member State experiencing problems is not unprecedented - following the disastrous COVID-19 outbreak in Italy - Germany banned the export of PPE and closed its border, followed by other adjoining Member States closing theirs - and of course there is the disgraceful financial damage done to Greece by Germany.

The Chinese took full advantage of the EU's predicament and highlighted the fact to illustrate that "solidarity did not exist in the EU" and that China would be a better partner for Italy than the EU.   
The EU "Blockade" by any other name was clearly devised in order to pressure Boris Johnson to turning against the interests of UK population and to sell them out to the EU - as all the Member State leaders and governments have done with their own populations (though a few are now seeing the error of their ways).

This action by the EU has two principal aims: (1) to satiate the appetite of some of the more obviously unpleasant individuals in the EU who wish to punish the British people for challenging the EU, and  (2) to force Boris into accepting a bad EU deal or alternately force an extension.
Either way it is designed to stop Britain leaving the EU at any cost.

Boris and Lord Frost must stand firm - Sovereignty is non-negotiable - be wary of a Merkel's trap - neither the EU, May nor Merkel he can be trusted.

13th December 2020

UK -EU Faux Negotiations

Boris, You must take back Britain's freedom from the shackles of the EU. It is long past the time that we stopped dancing to Merkel's tune - she is a throwback to the old Communist East German form of control. 

Merkel lived in East Germany from the age of 3 months and was brought up and went to University in East Germany. She was a member of the Communist Youth Movement. Her family actually emigrated from the free West Germany to a country under Communist rule. 

It does not matter who the UK representatives negotiate with from the EU the bottom line is that Merkel makes all the decisions.

According to Douglas Murray in a Daily Mail article published of the 12th December 2020:

"Angela Merkel is the daughter of a Lutheran pastor. 

Known as Mutti – or Mummy – to voters, her formative years were in East Germany, the Communist state ruled over by the Stasi. Like others, she belonged the Free German Youth (FDJ), the official communist youth movement. Rectitude and certainty pour from her. And she has no time for Boris Johnson, a man she dismisses – with remarkable condescension – as no more than a dissembler and a libertine."

"According to a 2013 biography, Merkel was no mere cultural officer of the Free German Youth, but a higher ranking 'Agitation and Propaganda functionary' – claims she has never openly denied." (link)

Germans love Merkel because she tells them what to do plus she has looked after German interests above all else to enhance her own power. 

Needless to say, being brought up as a Communist, she understands Russian and Chinese ideology, culture and ambitions. being involved in "AgitProp" she is also familiar with the techniques used by the Stasi, and perhaps has former associates on her side.

Deutschland, Deutschland über alles ...

Merkel has only two interests - keeping Power and Germany, and any opposition must be crushed. She has successfully used the EU to Germany's advantage by keeping the southern EU member states dependent upon the northern ones.  She has kept the Euro lower than Germany's "Deutschmark" would be if Germany was outside the EU, thus increasing Germany's export potential. 

Further, she has successfully organised trade and political ties with China - where there is a massive market for German cars - through personal visits to Wuhan over several years. So the EU is not her main concern, only how it can be used for German interests - Germany has no problems working outside of EU control - why does the UK have to "jump through hoops" (rhetorical question). 

Basically it is about Germany finding the best potential market for German cars which also has the cheapest, best educated labour force - Germany has clearly taken all the cheap labour it can from the EU Member States plus some suitable well educated migrants from Syria.

The Chinese Communist Parties also funds German political parties in Bavaria, a clear and dangerous conflict of interest for Germany and the whole of Europe. 

With Russia, Merkel has been negotiating "Nordstream 2" a natural gas pipeline between Russia and Germany - in spite of proclaiming that Germany is embarking on the "Green New Deal" (UN Agenda 21). (Natural gas is now thought to be more harmful on the Ozone Layer than coal emissions (link)).

Her attempts to carpet Germany with "Wind Turbines", "Photo-Voltaic Cells" and "Biomass" have been an unmitigated disaster for the German population and environment and have no effect on CO2 emissions, and Boris (Carrie) is planning to do the same in the UK.

But Merkel has been a disaster for the Germany (inadvertently) and the EU all along: 

After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Tsunami disaster she banned Germany from building any new nuclear plants. 

Added to which by ending of all coal-fired power stations by 2030 and its existing nuclear power plants by 2022 - Germany will be dependant solely upon renewables (plus natural gas from Russia!). 

Merkel was instrumental in the "Diesel Scandal. attempting to replace all petrol vehicles which produced CO2 with diesel which produced less CO2, but added other noxious particulates and Nitrogen gases. 

Some German car manufacturers also developed software/hardware methods to illegally circumvent emission restrictions during emission testing, and were later required to pay compensation.

Now petrol and diesel vehicles will be removed and that will likely end the "age of the personal motor vehicle" for most people - since unreliable electric vehicles, which also carry a large manufacturing pollution footprint, will be unaffordable for most people. 

In 2015, Merkel precipitated another disaster for Germany and once again also included most other EU member states when, at the behest of the UN (Peter Sutherland), wishing to breakdown the internal borders of the EU member states and make their populations Multicultural - Merkel opened up the EU to mass unregulated, often undocumented immigration into the EU. 

Merkel has since embarked on a programme of removing any failed asylum seekers from Germany (the subject of the next Blogpost) - Germany passed a new immigration law in June 2019 , which includes an “Orderly Return Law”. Britain needs to get its act together.

Faux Negotiations

I hope that Boris, and Lord Frost are aware of who they are really dealing with in these negotiations and how far Merkel is willing to go to cripple the UK economy on behalf of Germany and coincidentally the EU. 

Macron also has delusions of grandeur but France is being taken over - disappearing into oblivion culturally, but sustained financially within the EU by CAP and CFP - removing British waters from CFP control would leave Macron diminished even further. It would do little for the EU's credibility. 

The possibility of an EU blockade would escalate tensions for some time but this is not the first time that Germany (Hitler) or France (Napoleon) have tried that tactic.

Fortunately, Britain can still survive whatever the EU (Merkel) throws at at it (only 8% of British companies (13%of GDP) actually trade with the EU) - and most of what Merkel has planned would be unlawful in terms of International Law and under WTO rules. 

Unfortunately, the Communist Chinese virus has seemingly laid waste to parts of the UK economy - with the help of SAGE, but the rest of the world has also been affected badly too, particularly the EU.

Under no circumstances can Boris or Lord Frost be allowed to give away anything to Merkel and Germany that it can be used to further subvert the UK economically.

The best tactic is to keep negotiating until the 31st of December 2020 and then NO DEAL is automatic. 

On the 1st of January 2021, Repeal Theresa May's EU Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration (and any secret side-deals she did with the EU using Henry VIII powers) in our Parliament on the grounds of "Bad Faith" by the EU. 

That is the only way to be truly free of EU control (Boris has the Majority and a Mandate to do that). 

If Boris fails to take Britain out of EU control then Britain will lose all credibility and trust around the world, as EU leaders gloat about how clever they are; and how stupid the British were to vote for another Tory. 

With that the British people will become a subjugated population in an Occupied country once more - courtesy of their own Elected Representatives - déjà vu.

ps Germans are the only EU population that will not be subjugated in the final manifestation of the EU - because of its post-war Constitution. 

14th December 2020

Sadiq Khan's Defunding London Police

Sadiq Khan has "Defunded the London Police Force" of £110 million at a time of an exponential rise in crime in London (link). Add to that, he wants to put London into Lockdown and close the schools early for Christmas. No Labour politician can any longer decry Police cuts after this reckless move in London.

Khan is a Fabian Labour Mayor doing all he can to close down our economy, and ably assist Marxist BLM, which should be classified as a terrorist organisation (it is the daughter of the Black Power movement under another name). BLM marches on our streets and operates behind our backs within our Institutions using Maoist inspired "Cult" intimidation techniques, popularised by Mao Zedong (Mao Tse-tung) in the 1960s-70s China. 

BLM appear to already have control of some of our MSM, the National Trust, the FA, RADA (link), Eton, Rodean and our elite Universities, it encourages pulling down our statues and threateningly displays its trained black-shirted Militia. How long before it expands its Maoist ideology within the Civil Service, Military and Parliament (already in progress - since 2014)?  

Defunding BLM is a much better idea - do not donate to them - it has untaxed millions of pound/dollars already from gullible supporters who do not realise that it is using "Racism" as a cover for its far more sinister activities, in America, the UK and Canada. 

In August this year it formed a leftwing UK political party - carefully hiding its name behind the title "TTIP" - "Taking The Initiative Party". (link) Note: that you have to read quite a way down its website pages to the section on "Reparations"  before you realise that it is BLM's website in disguise.

BLM are taking the initiative alright, while the country is fighting the Covid-19 virus - and the country looks the other way - because they have been deliberately shamed for something that was not their fault (slavery) - BLM are slowly taking over our Institutions from the inside.

13th December 2020

Boris's Climate Disaster

Boris, man-made CO2 has little or no effect on climate change compared to other natural factors. 

We are currently in an interglacial period during which the Earth’s temperature rises and then falls at the onset of the next glacial period. 

Updated

One other consideration - look at the difference in temperatures on cloudy and clear nights - the warming effect on cloudy nights is due to water vapour, some of which condenses to form clouds of small floating water droplets that scatter all wavelengths of light, a process known as "Mie Scattering" (after Gustav Mie) which show as white clouds (link). Water vapour is very effective at retaining some of the radiated energy that the Earth’s surface has absorbed from the Sun with subsequent warming causing re-emitted energy in the form of Infra Red radiation. 

On a clear night without water vapour (few or no clouds) the temperature would not fall if CO2 in the atmosphere is what keeping the Earth warm - but we get frost in the early hours. 

That is because, in this case, the daytime energy input to the Earth’s surface from the Sun is re-emitted as IR radiation which rapidly escapes through the atmosphere into space – obviously any CO2 in the atmosphere is not preventing that re-radiated energy from leaving the Earth.  

Atmospheric gases Nitrogen (78.08%) and Oxygen (20.95%) and Argon (0.93%) plus trace gases are transparent as far as Infrared radiation is concerned and IR sensitive CO2 concentration is in minute quantities - just 0.038%.

The effect of cloud cover and night time temperatures has been carefully evaluated by a recent study by Exeter University which states that (as might be expected): 

"University of Exeter scientists studied warming from 1983 to 2017 and  found a difference in mean annual temperature of more than 0.25°C  between daytime and night-time warming in over half of the global land  surface."

“Increased cloud cover cools the surface during the day and retains the warmth during the night, leading to greater night-time warming. Whereas, decreasing cloud cover allows more warmth to reach the surface during the day, but that warmth is lost at night.” (link)

Why is the IR radiative energy from the ground surface "lost at night" under little cloud cover if CO2 is such a potent 'Greenhouse' gas, that causes dangerous warming or acts as a 'Blanket' or the 'glass of a Greenhouse'? 

The "Greenhouse" effect of CO2 is being greatly exaggerated. 

It is either, not as large as they want us to believe, or it has little or no effect at the current concentrations in the atmosphere?

The idea of "Global Warming" came about from observations of Venus, our "Twin" planet - but its atmosphere is 95% CO2, it is closer to the Sun - and does not rotate like the Earth does. 

Isn't it a gigantic "stretch" to equate what happened on Venus to what they are claiming will happen on our planet with minuscule quantities of CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere (0.038%)? 

A third consideration is that most CO2 emissions began after World War II industrialisation. "Half of all human consumption of fossil fuels and cement production has occurred since the mid 1970s.     

"Global temperature proxies (sediments, boreholes, pollen, oxygen-18, stalagmites, magnesium to calcium ratios, algae, cave formation, etc. over a wide geographical range) show a warming trend starting around 1700, with warming and cooling periods about the trend." (link)

In reality, Boris is selling the UN's "Agenda 21" and the World Economic Forum's "Great Reset". Which want to herd everyone into "smart" megacities with smart meters, under mass surveillance, with everything controlled by the Internet of Things (IOT), which can also be monitored by BB (1984). You must also know that most of the jobs will be farmed-off overseas to EU and Chinese companies. 

They plan to take away all personal forms of transport apart from bicycles and electric scooters and deliberately reduce the world population from its current level by 2050. 

It is not a dream - it is a Communist Chinese Dystopia - also coming to the United States now that President Donald Trump has been removed by US MSM and the leftwing Democrats. 

Look at what happened in Germany (2009 -2017) – and no reduction in CO2 - see Blogpost below:

Electricity bills will "rocket", and people will freeze as the supply is frequently disrupted by weather problems and network instabilities, local environments will be ruined for years to come, and insulation will be inadequate because of corruption and cost saving by companies given contracts without due diligence. Solve those problems first. 

Even worse

The plan to keep the UK warm revolves around using Hydrogen gas boilers - which release H2O (as water vapour) and it is water vapour that is the main "Greenhouse gas" on Earth, not CO2. So we will be kept warm alright as we pump more and more water vapour into the atmosphere. 

All the exaggerated "problems" which are claimed about "man-made" CO2 by its proponents will be much worse for "man-made" water vapour emissions and they will be much more difficult to tax, after the population has been driven into poverty trying to fix the made-up problem. 

To put it all into context - "Christine Stewart, then Canadian Minister of the Environment, speaking before editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald in 1998, said, “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

 see Global Warming Alarmism: When Science IS Fiction (link)

The bottom line is that AGW is a fraud, which, ironically has nothing to do with Climate or industrialisation, it is a "cover" for bringing about world Communism to control an unsuspecting public.

Friday 11th December 2020

Gove's NI Giveaway!

To allow any EU official acting in behalf of the EU's ECJ on to sovereign British soil is an an act of abject surrender to the EU - what is Gove thinking? 

We do not need to be supervised, as an "Occupied Country" would be subjugated - this should be withdrawn immediately. Basically the EU have placed a border in Northern Ireland and will claim that we placed it there.

Any EU official must be resident in EU territory not in NI - this is a matter of principal - they could be sent all prior necessary documentation and invited to inspect any consignment considered to be non-compliant. 

This is done already, as a routine, to check for illegal traffic - or is everything just waved through Calais into the EU? 

Side Note: There has been a border post in Ireland since the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) where you can get currency exchange etc. What has changed is that the border guards (Troops) are gone and so are the Watchtowers. The argument about a border is nonsense - the military border will not return - the UK will not build such a border. If there is a border it will be built by the EU.   

To make this offer to the EU Gove used the stupid comment like "we already have EU officials in the UK related to Eurostar" which is an insult and is treating the British people with contempt - the EU officials are in the UK because we have not yet left the EU!

There is no reason for any EU official to be on our side of the border, say for example, an EU vet "checking on the UK customs procedures" and animal safety etc., when they can equally be placed on EU soil - in Eire. 

This "concession" gives the EU the power of  an Occupying Force - by invitation. 

That might be OK for Scotland which appears to be happy to be Occupied by the EU and so does Eire, apparently. In reality, for Scotland being in the EU is good for the leaders of the SNP - but for the Scots themselves?

The timing at this critical juncture is beyond belief, such action simply shows that our leaders are weak or either never really intended to follow through on their Manifesto promises - we can now only hope that the EU forces a no deal. 

Lord Frost appears to be being undermined at the 11th hour by our government.

After we saw Cummings and Cain removed from Downing Street by Boris's girlfriend we called for Boris to go and now we call for him and Gove to go or up their game before they cause any more harm to the UK. 

The Commons must vote these actions down.

There can be no surrender to the EU. The majority of the electorate voted to leave the EU in 2016 because they realised, from experience, that the EU is not a benign, peace brokering, benevolent organisation which looks after its member states' interests - it seeks only to destroy them - by simply turning them into Multicultural regions of a greater Germany with little coherent identity.

It has been stated previously why we want to leave and what the government must do to facilitate that - before they embark on a full surrender to the EU we repeat those demands:

• Sovereignty: We  must make our own laws through a system which allows the British people  to remove the same elected representatives who enacted those laws. We need to have our Constitution reformed.

• We  must never again adopt a system where laws are made outside of our Parliament but our elected representatives treacherously pretend that  those laws originated solely from debates within our Parliament - the  scandalous situation that existed in Britain for the  past 48 years (on the 1st January 2021).

• We  must never again be subject to the supervision by any foreign court for the laws that we enact. Our faux "Supreme" Court must be replaced with a  new system entirely populated by Justices with whom the interests of  Britain are paramount - and who cannot be overruled. 

• Fishing Grounds: These  must be returned to the sovereign control of the British people - any  other Nation that wishes to fish those waters must apply for a quota and  observe our rules and abide by our environmental priorities.   

• Borders: Our  borders must never again be under the control of a foreign power and no British government or Prime Minister can ever again be allowed such  power as to negate the freedoms or rights of the British people or the control of  its sovereign territory. (That must become part of our Constitution).

• Defence: Under no circumstances can we be tied to providing our armed forces, research  facilities or civilian capabilities to the defence of the EU - under  its control - i.e. requiring an oath of allegiance to the EU by our armed forces. 

• Any UK military involvement must be authorised by the UK Parliament as part of NATO

• Law and Order: The British people cannot be part of the EU's authoritarian legal system, for example, the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) - our own Constitution  cannot be circumvented on the altar of convenience or compliance with  any foreign legal system. We must not abandon the legal right of "Habeas Corpus" and "Trial by Jury" for any British Citizen.

If you cannot achieve all of these requirements in these talks then revoke Theresa May's "Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration" - which was only ever designed to be an alternative to a "Remain" option in a planned 2nd Referendum anyway. The grounds for revocation are well established - "Bad Faith on behalf of the EU" - which is well documented.   

There is no point in continuing with negotiations because the arguments are only really about the same points of contention - which will never be resolved to the satisfaction of the both parties. In which case the only reason for continuing is for the EU to try to force an extension - after 4 1/2 years of the same to-ing and fro-ing. This would keep UK cash flowing to the EU and keep the UK trapped without any possible change. 

"No Deal" scaremongering - EU Propaganda.

The EU and its supporters are trying to frighten the British people in order to put pressure on Boris to capitulate - instead read the facts about NO Deal from an expert:

Barnaby Lane

July 6

Economist. Pro-Europe, Pro-Brexit

Does Boris really mean that no deal is a good option?

He means it because it’s a good option. We don’t have to put up with the EU demanding we surrender to their courts and laws. Nor do we have to let them control access to our fishing waters.

This is not a new claim. It’s been core to the pro-Brexit thinking for many years.

Still, maybe you, dear reader, have been so overwhelmed by propaganda telling you we’re doomed if we don’t go for a deal with the EU, that you don’t know how to tell the wood from the trees, or how to distinguish myth from fact. If that’s you, you are not alone. 

The more curious among you however, may have felt a certain unease with the propaganda, particularly its failure to explain why:

• Britain itself is incapable of doing what most of the world already does, which is to trade successfully with the EU under WTO rules

• Britain’s exporters cannot do in Europe, what they already do worldwide, namely, to trade successfully under WTO rules.

If you’ve been wondering these things, hopefully the following facts will help clear things up.

There’s no hiding one downside: if Britain traded with the EU on WTO terms, there would be an EU tariff barrier facing its exports. Britain originally decided to join what was then called the Common Market, in order to place itself on the right side of that barrier. 

At that time, the Common Market tariff wall against industrial imports was high, at around 15–20%.

Today, however, successive rounds of world trade liberalisation under the auspices of the GATT/WTO have largely demolished that wall, and the EU’s tariffs towards imported industrial products amount on average to no more than about 3%. 

Today, it makes remarkably little difference to Britain, as an exporter of industrial products, whether it’s inside or outside that minimal tariff wall. It’s a question of either zero, or 3%.

True enough, within this 3% average, public attention has been drawn to a few stray high rates of duty. In some cases these EU tariffs can range up to 50% or more, especially on foodstuffs. 

However, wherever the EU sets abnormally high rates of duty, it is almost always on products of which Britain is a net importer (eg food and agricultural products, textiles and clothing, footwear, motor vehicles, semiconductors). 

That’s the origin of the claim “WTO rules would harm the EU more than they would harm us”, and in absolute terms, there’s some truth to it.

While Britain remains tied to EU laws, it is compelled to impose these high EU tariffs, raising the country’s import bill and increasing the cost of living. Once free of EU laws, Britain will be free to dismantle these burdens as it sees fit.

What will be the overall effect of trading with the EU on WTO rules? In order to estimate this, the best guide is to observe their actual experience of their operation in practice, around the world. How has that panned out? Well, there are two core points.

• First, the worldwide experience of British exporters trading on WTO terms. Britain already trades on those terms with more than 100 countries worldwide. 

That’s about 45% of Britain’s total exports. About the same as its exports to the EU. As it happens, British exports have for many years been more successful outside the EU than within it: most of the growth in Britain’s trade has come from outside Europe (the bulk of it on WTO terms), while exports to the EU have stagnated.

In spite of this, there lingers this curious myth that the EU Single Market has been a British export success. There is no evidence for such a claim. And indeed, nothing could be further from the truth. Most of Britain’s export successes have been outside Europe, mainly on the basis set by the WTO.

• Second, the worldwide experience of Third Countries trading with the EU on WTO terms. The EU Single Market was launched in 1992, in order to spur cross border trade among EU member states. However, it has failed in that. Perhaps surprisingly, during the life of the Single Market, Third Countries have in fact increased their exports to the EU faster than the EU Member States have themselves increased their exports to one another.

• A fortiori, those Third Countries have suffered no disadvantage through being outside the Single Market. If Britain shortly becomes one of them, trading with the EU on WTO terms, there is long and widespread evidence that it need not fear that prospect.

Two counter arguments are often raised at this point. 

• 1. Ah but the EU doesn’t trade on these countries on pure WTO terms, it has lots of mini deals! 

And 

• 2. Ah but British exporters would need to wave a piece of paper at customs proving compliance from day 1, otherwise its products get blocked at the border! These arguments are so often repeated, that people might assume they contain a grain of truth. 

They don’t. Indeed, both arguments are nonsense!

• Firstly, it doesn’t matter what mini deals you have. The Most Favoured Nation (MFN) condition requires that you give equal treatment to all countries except those with whom you have a preferential trade agreement. 

The EU has only 35 such agreements, most of them with small countries. If the EU has 120 mini deals with the US, none of them legally enable the EU to treat the US better than the UK. 

• The second argument is more straightforward. Legally, it is the EU’s responsibility to ensure it never blocks a compliant product. If the EU can’t find a method to allow the UK to comply with its border requirements from day 1, that is the EU’s problem, not the UK’s.

Summing up, the experience of both British and foreign exporters trading on WTO terms suggests that Britain can well afford to let those be the terms on which it trades with the EU. 

And while, as a civilised country, Britain will always be ready to negotiate constructively with its neighbours, it has no need to be afraid of rejecting an unacceptable agreement with the EU: for example, an agreement which is available only with distasteful neo-colonial strings.

The great merit of the WTO rules is that they come without strings. They leave Britain free to develop its trade relations worldwide, while equally re-shaping its internal laws to make its industries competitive in the post-pandemic world.

In answer to the question therefore, of course Johnson meant it when he said no-deal was a good option. There’s no reason whatsoever, to doubt it.

Euexit Comment - No Deal doom mongering is just amplified noise - a final attempt to frighten the British people into capitulating to EU domination. 

7th December 2020

Updated* 10th December 2020

Millwall Fans - Not Fooled by BLM

Unlike some of our MSM and the most of the British establishment, it seems that Millwall football fans attending last weekends match between Millwall and Derby County quite rightly "booed" their team for "Taking the Knee" to BLM before the game. 

The players would claim that they were showing their opposition to the (quite unproven) "institutional Racism" in the UK and to virtue signal their support for Black people against oppression in the UK and elsewhere - past and present! 

But Britain now is the most tolerant, and least Racist country in the western world, with a Police force that has never routinely carried guns (except in Northern Ireland), and who target crime based upon crime statistics. That is not to say that there aren't any bad people in any institution in the UK.

Where crime is associated with ethnic minorities it is usually associated with drugs and poverty, poor housing, education and deprivation - almost always associated with left-wing (Labour) Council areas of London, and other major cities with large populations. 

That is not to say that indigenous English people do not commit crime - many are as bad if not worse. A majority of ethnic minorities are hardworking, honest, laudable and loyal to Britain, they love living in the UK and are usually well settled in mixed communities and fully integrated. Again there are be some exceptions in certain areas.

Many from the EU (at least 3 million) do not want to leave the UK and it seems that everybody in the world and their relatives want to come and live in the UK - a very unlikely decision to take if the UK was a Racist country. 

But you do not need to be a research fellow or professor of History at one of our prestigious Universities (though not quite so prestigious or laudable any more since the rise of the Maoist "Cancel Culture") to discover that BLM is an anti-White, Marxist, revolutionary movement - a re-incarnation of the "Black Power Movement" in 1960s and 1970s America with the same objectives; and mentored by some of those original protest organisers. (link)

BLM is hiding behind Racism to push its political agenda, the takeover the established order in the USA, UK and Canada. Even its main slogan is Racist, implying that no other lives matter. 

It was formed in 2013, not after the death of George Floyd in Minnesota in 2020. Its original left-wing "Manifesto" included "abolish the nuclear family, police, prisons and capitalism".

"Black Lives Matter seeks to replace the foundational cornerstones of American society: 1) abolish the Judeo-Christian concept of the traditional nuclear family, the basic social unit in America; 2) abolish the police and dismantle the prison system; 3) mainstream transgenderism and delegitimise so-called heteronormativity (the belief that heterosexuality is the norm); and 4) abolish capitalism (a free economy) and replace it with communism (a government-controlled economy)." Note: The above  referenced article was later removed from the BLM website.

BLM's real objective is to foment a race war within the UK (BLM already have  trained "black - shirted" Militias waiting in the wings) while it takes over the UK's institutions by stealth - these latter activities are BLM's implementation of the Marxist *"Critical Theory" and "Intersectional Theory" in Britain through infiltration and re-education by "Diversity Officers" within our public institutions. The are the same institutions infiltrated previously by "New" Labour acolytes - and paid for through the public purse.

Update*

These theories are just that - unproven ideas put together by the Marxist Frankfurt School, (not an actual school - more a group of Marxist radical scholars) founded in the 1920s and operating from the 1930s until Hitler kicked them out of Germany. They initially went to the USA (Columbia University), from there some went back to Germany after the war and the rest went on to California - from where all the theories were disseminated through literature - e.g. Herbert Marcuse with "Eros and Civilisation (1955) and through the US education system; "and were influential in the leftist student movements of the 1960s, particularly after the 1968 student rebellions in Paris and West Berlin and at Columbia University." (Britannica)

The ideas of the Frankfurt School are based upon attempts to "integrate" the work of Marx and Freud, having perceived that Marx's earlier work was not producing the necessary revolutionary fervour beyond the Soviet Union into the Capitalist west. Critical Theory encompasses Critical Race Theory,"Cultural theory, Gender Theory and Queer Theory". 

Paula Rosenberg spread a lot of the ideas through books such as " Race, Class and Gender in the USA" (2016) - her book is required reading in 1000 US Colleges.

From these ideas came the notion of "Race" linked to  "Privilege" etc. - whereby: 

• "If a White person abuses a Black (or other ethnic minority person) that is a Racist act, but if a Black (or other ethnic minority person) abuses a White person that is not a Racist act because Black and ethnic minority people do not have Privilege and the White person does have Privilege - by virtue of their position in society." 

This means that, according to Marxist-Freudian (Critical Theory), only white people can be racist - which is absurd - but it is the basis of BLM's antagonism towards white people. This system was designed by the Frankfurt School to extend the original Marx antagonism based primarily on "Class" difference to bring about revolution to more a widely distributed antagonism based upon additional societal differences - including "Class". 

BLM are working to overturn the Capitalist / Christianity based system in the USA, UK and Canada. BLM is not just active in Critical Race Theory; they cover all the Critical Theory bases, so-to-speak, particularly related to gender plus bringing down the  entire Capitalist system to replace it with a Communist dystopia. 

From a personal perspective, based upon observation of areas which have been taken over by Communism, is that it is simply regime change by another name which leads abject subjugation of the "Many" at the hands of the "Few". 

This is precisely what BLM are trying to do in the UK with their supporters in the MSM and our esteemed institutions and will be achieved more rapidly in the USA with the help of the Biden Administration.

These ideas are pursued more discretely through BLM's new political wing though - as they hope no-one will notice what they are really up to, until it is too late to stop them (Fabian Society modus operandi).  

BLM's Establishes a UK Political Party

BLM is now a registered political party in all but name. It is registered as "TTIP" 'The Taking the Initiative Party' (link). It was announced by BLMUK's leader Sasha Johnson on the 31st August 2020.  "TTIP also refers to the the Transatlantic Trade Investment Partnership" - related to proposed trade deal between the USA and the EU - this title links BLMUK with its American counter part.

In the above (link) there is a video discussion about racism in the UK, it is about 55 minutes long - but well worth it, if only for the contributions of an Iranian gentleman named Mahyar Tousi (Political YouTuber), in a live debate hosted by Turning Point UK.

BLMUK's website (link) is deliberately deceptive and does not contain the name BLM as far as I could see - it refers to being setup by business people, and offers "all things to all people". 

It is very well designed to entice practically everybody who reads it - but what it says is nothing like the reality of what is planned; which is available elsewhere online and on this website. 

Of course, this can be said about every political party but this BLM one is a real threat to the UK - it is about "Black Power" overturning the status quo and turning the UK into a Communist dystopia - see the section above, for a clear view of its real Manifesto. 

This is a very interesting and potentially dangerous website because of its potential to "suck-in" the well meaning, left-leaning virtue signallers' and many others - who perhaps have not really looked at BLM in any detail. 

Going through its Manifesto it is difficult to see anything other that what would be expected from any established politically Marxist party seeking to deceive the population, but early on it states under "Reparations" that:

"It has recently been highlighted that UK taxpayers have paid tax which has contributed to the compensation made to slave owners for the loss of property (black slaves). The British slave owners were compensated 20 million pounds in 1835 which is the equivalent of 17 billion pounds today.
Due to the country not having enough funds to pay the slave owners, the country raised bonds (borrowed money) in order to pay off the slave owners at the time. This money was paid back through UK taxpayers. This repayment of compensation has only been concluded in 2015 which would mean that everybody who has paid tax in the UK has unconsciously contributed to paying reparations to slave owners. 

What is profound about this set of circumstances is that the victims of slavery who ultimately suffered unthinkable abuse, endured extreme trauma and indiscretions have not been compensated in any way, shape, or form. It is our view that there would have to be some form of reparation for the black victims of slavery and similar to that of the Jewish community. We do not feel this is an unreasonable request from the black community for reparations to be paid in view of the circumstances." 

"Bingo! - this is the nub of the BLM movement." 

In other words BLM is mostly about money - pay up or we'll desecrate your Statues and denigrate your History etc., but actually this would only be the starting point of its ambitions. 

Even if we paid BLM £17 billion pounds (and our current government might just do that) - that would be only the start of its demands - you cannot buy-off BLM - its founders are self-proclaimed "trained Marxists" with higher ambitions (link).

Reading the rest of its Manifesto reveals that its emphasis is really about Police Reforms, Prisons and Education, in particular: "brainwashing" our young with liberal doses of Colonial "Shaming", coerced "Renunciation" of "White Privilege"and  "Cancelling" of any objector - à la  Mao's "Little Red Book".  

To illustrate BLM's infiltration into UK institutions - the recent experience of the Royal Academy of Arts (RADA) is one prime example that should concern anyone who believes that BLM is not a Marxist organisation (link).

Note: The BLM's Political website states that the Manifesto is "Preliminary" - so the "Reparations" section extract above might just disappear or be modified - as BLM have a habit of doing with their declared objectives - just to keep people onside until its too late for them to be stopped.

Do not donate to BLM or its political party - if it gains power it will bring untold misery to the UK. Please let others know the danger that BLM represents - ignore its supporters. Please distribute this article widely.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A more detailed list of BLM's objectives and ambitions is provided below:

"BLM's worldview is based on a mix of far-left theoretical frameworks, including critical race theory and intersectional theory. Critical race theory posits that racism is systemic, based on a system of white supremacy and therefore a permanent feature of American life. Intersectional theory asserts that people are often disadvantaged by multiple sources of oppression: their race, class, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and other identity markers.

Black Lives Matter and other purveyors of critical race theory and intersectional theory reject individual accountability for behaviour, criminal or otherwise, because, according to them, blacks are systemic and permanent victims of racism. Such racism, according to BLM, can only be defeated by completely dismantling the American economic, political and social system and rebuilding it from scratch — according to Marxist principles.

Black Lives Matter seeks to replace the foundational cornerstones of American society:      (Note: These BLM ambitions and objectives also apply to the UK)

Abolish the Traditional Nuclear Family

"In its policy agenda, Black Lives Matter states that it is committed to abolishing the traditional nuclear family:

"We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and 'villages' that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels rejected the traditional family because, according to them, the nuclear family, as an economic unit, sustains the capitalist system. Engels wrote: "The care and education of the children becomes a public affair; society looks after all children alike, whether they are legitimate or not."

Abolish Police and Prisons

BLM states that it wants to "defund" and ultimately "abolish" police and prisons in the United States. Police officers would be replaced by educators, social workers, mental health experts and religious leaders, who, according to BLM, would bring down the levels of crime.

In an interview with Newsweek, BLM co-founder Cullors said:

"The freedom of mostly white affluent people is predicated on the unfreedom of black people. So, law enforcement is not actually used to keep black people safe. They're used to patrol, occupy, harass, abuse, often hunt and mostly, what we've seen is kill our communities.

"Policing and incarceration are part of a continuum. The policing is the first response and then incarceration is the last response. And these two systems rely on each other very, very deeply. We have to be working on getting rid of both systems."

In an interview with the Hollywood Reporter, Cullors explained that she is not merely an activist but a modern-day abolitionist:

"An abolitionist believes in a world where police and prisons are no longer weaponised as a tool for public safety."

BLM co-founder Opal Tometi, in an interview with The New Yorker, claimed that policing in America has its roots in managing slavery and therefore is systemically racist. 

She explained:

"We have been fighting and advocating to stop a war on black lives. And that is how we see it — this is a war on black life. And people understand that this system is filled with all sorts of inequality and injustice, and that implicit bias and just outright racism is embedded in the way that policing is done in this nation — and when you think about it historically, it was founded as a slave patrol. The evolution of policing was rooted in that..." (It was not founded upon slave patrols in the UK)

Polls show that most Americans — including most blacks — do not share BLM's views on abolishing the police. A recent Rasmussen's report found that 63% of American adults "regard being a police officer as one of the most important jobs in our country today." Furthermore, 64% are concerned that the current anti-police sentiment will lead to fewer people willing to become police officers, and that it will "reduce public safety in the community where they live." Importantly, according to the Rasmussen report, "Blacks (67%) are the most concerned about public safety where they live, compared to 63% of whites and 65% of other minority Americans."

Abolish Heteronormativity

BLM's policy agenda states:

"We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle cisgender [a term for people whose gender identity matches their sex assigned at birth] privilege and uplift Black trans folk, especially Black trans women who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans-antagonistic violence....

An academic study titled, "The 'Queering' of Black Lives Matter," describes in great detail how issues of sexual identity and gender orientation have taken priority over BLM's original focus on police brutality. The heavy focus on sexuality has led to accusations that BLM is "a gay movement masquerading as a black one."

Two of the three founders of BLM describe themselves as "black queer females." One, Alicia Garza, is married to a biracial transgender male. Patrice Cullors describes herself as "polyamorous." In interview after interview, Garza and Cullors raise the issue of "black trans and gender nonconforming people," often to the exclusion of police brutality.

In an interview with The New Yorker, Garza said that she is not interested in the American tradition of live and let live: "We want to make sure that people are not saying, 'Well, whatever you are, I don't care.' No, I want you to care. I want you to see all of me."

Abolish Capitalism and the "Patriarchal" System

BLM equates capitalism with racism in the same way that its Antifa cousins equate capitalism with fascism. BLM's views on capitalism are based on the concept of "racial capitalism," a term created by the late Cedric Robinson, who posited that capitalism and racism are two sides of the same coin: both are, according to Robinson, dependent on slavery, violence, imperialism, and genocide.

The British wing of Black Lives Matter UK states: "We're guided by a commitment to dismantle imperialism, capitalism, white-supremacy, patriarchy and the state structures that disproportionately harm black people in Britain and around the world."

The Movement for Black Lives (M4BL), an "ecosystem" of over 170 Black-led organizations, including BLM, states:

"We are anti-capitalist: We believe and understand that Black people will never achieve liberation under the current global racialized capitalist system."

M4BL demands "a reconstruction of the economy to ensure Black communities have collective ownership" and "a progressive restructuring of tax codes at the local, state, and federal levels to ensure a radical and sustainable redistribution of wealth."

M4BL also demands reparations for past and continuing harms:

"The government, responsible corporations and other institutions that have profited off of the harm they have inflicted on Black people — from colonialism to slavery through food and housing redlining, mass incarceration, and surveillance — must repair the harm done. This includes:

"Full and free access for all Black people (including undocumented and currently and formerly incarcerated people) to lifetime education; a guaranteed minimum livable income for all Black people; reparations for the wealth extracted from our communities through environmental racism, slavery, food apartheid, housing discrimination and racialized capitalism."

The demands of BLM and M4BL are similar to those found in the Communist Manifesto, which include:

"Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes; A heavy progressive or graduated income tax; Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan."

BLM's Immediate Demand

BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors recently confirmed that the immediate goal is to remove U.S. President Donald J. Trump from office:

"Trump not only needs to not be in office in November, but he should resign now. Trump needs to be out of office. He is not fit for office. And so, what we are going to push for is a move to get Trump out. While we're also going to continue to push and pressure Joe Biden around his policies and relationship to policing and criminalisation. That's going to be important. But our goal is to get Trump out."

This is part of the explanation for the rioting and looting in Democratic State Cities, with the support of Democrat Mayors (where Democrat represents the political left).

Monday 23rd November 2020 

A Biden Win Makes No SenseBide

For four years the extreme political left, the Democrats and their corporate supporters in the USA, hounded President Donald Trump...just because he put on hold their ambitions to turn the USA into a Marxist Dystopia. 

President Trump hardly ever had a fair hearing after Hillary Clinton was side-swiped - "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" as they say. 

Of course, this was also operated in unison with the Marxists in the UK who went as far as building a "Trump" balloon depicting the President of the USA as a baby wearing a nappy. 

Clearly, the infantile behaviour was expressed by those who are ideologically opposed to Democracy and even good taste - they have no "Class", of course.  

But look beyond the obvious Marxist rhetoric from the US elite and MSM as well as in the UK and a different story emerges that none of the extremist politicians want the public to know about. 

For example, "Trump's Economy Really was Better than Obama's" (link) and also, the achievements that Trump made on behalf of Native Americas and African Americans among many others (link).

Donald Trump was the first American President in 40 years to recognise the danger that China represents to the USA and the free-world and how the relationships previously built-up by earlier Presidents (including Obama/Biden) led to the outsourcing of American jobs. 

Trump worked to address these iniquities. 

This outsourcing also took place in the EU and its individual member states have done the same in Europe - particularly, in Germany (Bavaria) which accepted donations to political parties from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) - as Germany independently builds relationships outside of the EU. 

The actions in the US over the years led to a major economic impact on the US workers, but it also led to a strategic impact in terms of high-tech industries and manufacturing, including pharmaceuticals - leading to a dangerous dependency on China by the USA which was encouraged by previous administrations - including Biden.

President Trump has not started any wars, whereas the Obama/Biden Presidency was actively involved in actions in the bombing of Libya and elsewhere; partly facilitating a "push" factor for mass immigration into Europe.  Trump meanwhile sought to bring peace to the Middle bringing together Israel with some of its Arab neighbours.

On the US domestic front - open rioting, looting, statue desecration and intimidation has run out of control in some Democrat controlled US cities, including Seattle, Washington and New York. 

While President Trump has attempted to have them brought under control the Democratic Party itself, together with local Democratic Mayors, has fully supported the actions of Marxist organisations BLM and Antifa - and protected their actions under the claims that the obvious violent anti-social behaviour was simply "peaceful protest". 

BLM are supported by the Democratic Party and its donations are processed through "ActBlue" - the same site for processing donations to Democratic Party candidates and other leftwing organisations.

Surely, Americans realise that a Biden administration could not do any better at solving the Covid-19 pandemic - it is a problem everywhere in the world, and almost certainly not contained even in China - though they would not admit it. 

The promising vaccine in the USA arrived at an unfortunate time for President Trump - but he was not responsible for the pandemic, and every country is now following China's lockdown techniques. 

By comparison with other countries Belgium has the largest number deaths per million (1,360) - apologies for using this marker because every life matters - but it is the method being used;  The USA is 11th on the list at 779 deaths per million - the UK has 822 deaths per million (all as of the 23rd November 2020) (link)

When it comes to the environment - the "Green New Deal" will be a disaster for the USA, it will result in ongoing massive tax increases to continually keep the system working (when it does actually work) and will not have any effect on CO2 emissions.

See Germany's experience in the Blogpost "UK Energy Future - Do Not Follow Germany" on this website. see also "Boris's 'Green Industrial Revolution' is lockdown for Ever..." (link)  For "Green Industrial Revolution" read "Green New Deal" or "UN Agenda 21".

What to also expect are attacks on the 2nd Amendment and a massive increase in Immigration; restrictions on Free-Speech and the continued demonisation of the White population on the Altar of Marxist Dogma - "Critical Race Theory". 

Did a majority of Americans really vote to have Biden and Harris take all their Freedoms away from them?

The real objections to the Trump Presidency are clearly not related to what is good for America but what is good for the Marxist left and its supporters. 

Communist China certainly could have provided the means and the cover for concerted attacks to remove President Trump from office - coordinated in the US with BLM, and others in the 'Transit Integrity Project (TIP)" involving "actors" from previous leftwing administrations. 

Although President Trump may not be able to prove that "Mail-in" ballot fraud took place, it is true that the Covid-19 pandemic provided the means and the cover for such a scenario. 

Perhaps what is more likely is that a software solution was initiated to ensure a victory for who can only be seen as a "caretaker President" until the extreme hard left are installed, take over and create the final stages of the Dystopia that BLM are currently spreading through the USA, Canada and the UK.

It is difficult to believe that the American voters could not see through the Democratic Party political fog and vote President Trump into power for a second term in Office - with an overwhelming majority.