Welcome to euexit.com
Thursday 26th November 2020
The origin of the 0.7% GDP (GNI) Foreign Aid Commitment
Thursday 26th November 2020
The origin of the 0.7% GDP (GNI) Foreign Aid Commitment
Monday 23rd November 2020
For four years the extreme political left, the Democrats and their corporate supporters in the USA, hounded President Donald Trump...just because he put on hold their ambitions to turn the USA into a Marxist Dystopia.
President Trump hardly ever had a fair hearing after Hillary Clinton was side-swiped - "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" as they say.
Of course, this was also operated in unison with the Marxists in the UK who went as far as building a "Trump" balloon depicting the President of the USA as a baby wearing a nappy.
Clearly, the infantile behaviour was expressed by those who are ideologically opposed to Democracy and even good taste - they have no "Class", of course.
But look beyond the obvious Marxist rhetoric from the US elite and MSM as well as in the UK and a different story emerges that none of the extremist politicians want the public to know about.
Donald Trump was the first American President in 40 years to recognise the danger that China represents to the USA and the free-world and how the relationships previously built-up by earlier Presidents (including Obama/Biden) led to the outsourcing of American jobs.
Trump worked to address these iniquities.
This outsourcing also took place in the EU and its individual member states have done the same in Europe - particularly, in Germany (Bavaria) which accepted donations to political parties from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) - as Germany independently builds relationships outside of the EU.
The actions in the US over the years led to a major economic impact on the US workers, but it also led to a strategic impact in terms of high-tech industries and manufacturing, including pharmaceuticals - leading to a dangerous dependency on China by the USA which was encouraged by previous administrations - including Biden.
President Trump has not started any wars, whereas the Obama/Biden Presidency was actively involved in actions in the bombing of Libya and elsewhere; partly facilitating a "push" factor for mass immigration into Europe. Trump meanwhile sought to bring peace to the Middle bringing together Israel with some of its Arab neighbours.
On the US domestic front - open rioting, looting, statue desecration and intimidation has run out of control in some Democrat controlled US cities, including Seattle, Washington and New York.
While President Trump has attempted to have them brought under control the Democratic Party itself, together with local Democratic Mayors, has fully supported the actions of Marxist organisations BLM and Antifa - and protected their actions under the claims that the obvious violent anti-social behaviour was simply "peaceful protest".
BLM are supported by the Democratic Party and its donations are processed through "ActBlue" - the same site for processing donations to Democratic Party candidates and other leftwing organisations.
Surely, Americans realise that a Biden administration could not do any better at solving the Covid-19 pandemic - it is a problem everywhere in the world, and almost certainly not contained even in China - though they would not admit it.
The promising vaccine in the USA arrived at an unfortunate time for President Trump - but he was not responsible for the pandemic, and every country is now following China's lockdown techniques.
By comparison with other countries Belgium has the largest number deaths per million (1,360) - apologies for using this marker because every life matters - but it is the method being used; The USA is 11th on the list at 779 deaths per million - the UK has 822 deaths per million (all as of the 23rd November 2020) (link)
When it comes to the environment - the "Green New Deal" will be a disaster for the USA, it will result in ongoing massive tax increases to continually keep the system working (when it does actually work) and will not have any effect on CO2 emissions.
See Germany's experience in the Blogpost "UK Energy Future - Do Not Follow Germany" on this website. see also "Boris's 'Green Industrial Revolution' is lockdown for Ever..." (link) For "Green Industrial Revolution" read "Green New Deal" or "UN Agenda 21".
What to also expect are attacks on the 2nd Amendment and a massive increase in Immigration; restrictions on Free-Speech and the continued demonisation of the White population on the Altar of Marxist Dogma - "Critical Race Theory".
Did a majority of Americans really vote to have Biden and Harris take all their Freedoms away from them?
The real objections to the Trump Presidency are clearly not related to what is good for America but what is good for the Marxist left and its supporters.
Communist China certainly could have provided the means and the cover for concerted attacks to remove President Trump from office - coordinated in the US with BLM, and others in the 'Transit Integrity Project (TIP)" involving "actors" from previous leftwing administrations.
Although President Trump may not be able to prove that "Mail-in" ballot fraud took place, it is true that the Covid-19 pandemic provided the means and the cover for such a scenario.
Perhaps what is more likely is that a software solution was initiated to ensure a victory for who can only be seen as a "caretaker President" until the extreme hard left are installed, take over and create the final stages of the Dystopia that BLM are currently spreading through the USA, Canada and the UK.
It is difficult to believe that the American voters could not see through the Democratic Party political fog and vote President Trump into power for a second term in Office - with an overwhelming majority.
You might have guessed it - it comes from joining the EU in the 1970's and, to cut a long story short, it was designed to "Big-Up" the EU as an International player - just like its plans to take over our Embassies and Consulates; and taking away the UK seat from the UN and other international bodies, and replacing with an EU seat.
So it is not really about helping other people around the world it is about the EU buying influence around the world using money from its Member States - the EU does not use its own money - it is a giant PONZI scheme where the members only ever lose out.
In fact, in Africa the EU is trying to form Trade agreements with former British Colonies - which are arrangements providing little more than impoverishment for the local populations by taking the raw exports (i.e. Coffee etc.) and processing them in the EU at a vast profit. These ex-colonies doe not want an intrusive trade deal with the EU (EU interference in government and policy areas) they want free trade deals with the UK.
Anyway, the origins of the 0.7% GDP are laid out clearly in an article in a 2015 article (link):
"EU member states must finally make good on their pledge to spend 0.7% of gross national income on foreign aid as the world prepares to agree the development agenda for the next 15 years, a European Commissioner has warned."
"Neven Mimica, the EU commissioner for international cooperation and development, said that honouring the commitment on official development assistance (ODA) would enhance Europe’s global standing and help pressure other countries into accepting their financial responsibilities."
"'The EU should collectively recommit to the target of spending 0.7% of gross national income spent on ODA,' he said."
He went on to state:
Speaking as the European commission published its plans for the post-2015 agenda, Mimica said that July’s development finance conference in Ethiopia and September’s UN meeting to agree the sustainable development goals would both require demonstrations of good faith and generosity."
If there was a good reason for this aid it is because China is actively Colonising increasing areas of the world and spreading its influence - not benignly though.
China gives out loans and then confiscates State assets or takes control of vital infrastructure, such as ports, when the debt becomes due and cannot be repaid.
This trick was used by Germany when it loaned money to Greece to buy German cars - with its State assets as collateral - and then took over Greece's State assets when Greece was unable to pay back the loans. Germany also took cash (loan interest) when its own cash machines were running a "bit short".
Britain's influence can be extended without recolonising - but we should decide on the amount not some other "authority" or its supporters in our Parliament.
Note: Nick Clegg was a prime mover in ensuring that the UK were kept tied to this commitment while he was part of the 2015 Con / lib coalition - now it seems that he is working for the EU through Facebook.
Monday 23rd November 2020
Boris - Stop the Talking ...
This is now getting ridiculous...What have you achieved so far? Playing stupid games will get you nowhere. After promising the Earth you are now just playing the electorate for fools. Get Brexit Done!
If you have forgotten what that means - here is a reminder:
Sovereignty: We must make our own laws through a system which allows the British people to remove the same elected representatives who enacted those laws. We need to have our Constitution reformed.
We must never again adopt a system where laws are made outside of our Parliament but our elected representatives treacherously pretend that those laws originated solely from debates within our Parliament - the scandalous situation that existed in Britain for the past 46 years .
We must never again be subject to the supervision by any foreign court for the laws that we enact. Our faux "Supreme" Court must be replaced with a new system entirely populated by Justices with whom the interests of Britain are paramount - and who cannot be overruled.
Fishing Grounds: These must be returned to the sovereign control of the British people - any other Nation that wishes to fish those waters must apply for a quota and observe our rules and abide by our environmental priorities.
Borders: Our borders must never again be under the control of a foreign power and no British government or Prime Minister can ever again be allowed such power as to negate the freedoms of the British people or the control of its sovereign territory. (That must become part of our Constitution).
Defence: Under no circumstances can we be tied to providing our armed forces, research facilities or civilian capabilities to the defence of the EU - under its control - i.e. requiring an oath of allegiance to the EU by our armed forces.
Any UK military involvement must be authorised by the UK Parliament as part of NATO
Law and Order: The British people cannot be part of the EU's authoritarian legal system, for example, the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) - our own Constitution cannot be circumvented on the altar of convenience or compliance with any foreign legal system.
It is time that you made a statement on progress, regarding these matters before the EU runs down the clock and "you get caught with your pants down"- to the detriment of the UK population.
If you cannot achieve all of these requirements in these talks then revoke Theresa May's "Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration" - which was only ever designed to be an alternative to a "Remain" option in a planned 2nd Referendum anyway. The grounds for revocation are well established - "Bad Faith on behalf of the EU" and well documented.
And ... Boris's Build Back Badly
Between 2009 and 2017 German consumers were deprived of 550 billion euros for no change in CO2 emissions;
“… carbon dioxide emissions in Germany have been rising since 2009, even though well over a hundred billion euros have been spent on the expansion of solar and wind energy over the same period. The financial obligations undertaken in the process will continue to burden taxpayers for another two decades and will end up costing German consumers a total sum of around 550 billion euros.”
see "UK Energy Future - Do Not Follow Germany" post below this article
see also "Boris’s “Green Industrial Revolution” is Economic Lockdown, for Ever…" (link)
Houses of EU Quislings
Is this the real reason why Theresa May would not resign?
Is the real reason because she is working with the EU to ensure that Britain is made into a "Vassal State", so that it can no longer slow down the progress of EU integration and, in particular, to get rid of the trouble-making backbench Tory "Brexiteers?"
This idea stems from an article - 2019 – 009 May is far, far more underhand and deceitful than we ever thought possible. 6 March, 2019 on theeuroprob.org website.
The report focuses upon events in the Summer of 2018 leading to the "Chequers" ambush of Theresa May's Cabinet by her, and her Civil Servants - at the Prime Minster's country retreat on the Chiltern Downs.
"There was very important business: Theresa May, flanked by senior civil servant Olly Robbins, presented the draft agreement for Britain’s departure from the EU."
"For the first time, ministers (including Brexit secretary David Davis and foreign secretary Boris Johnson) saw the proposed terms – and the extent to which May would abide by her pledge of ‘Brexit means Brexit’."
"The chief whip instructed that nobody could leave without consenting to the Withdrawal Agreement, unless they resigned – and must then find their way home without ministerial transport."
David Davis and Boris Johnson resigned the following day.
Prior to the debacle at Chequers, May had visited Angela Merkel in Berlin, and indeed she stated, at Chequers; that "no changes could be made to the, so called "Chequers Agreement" since Merkel had signed it off (agreed it)"
"According to a confidential source who has seen a complete transcript of the meeting, the two leaders agreed to a plan that Mrs May allegedly told the Chancellor would “appease” Brexit voters while nonetheless enabling her to get rid of those Tories who were (in her words) “against progress and unity in the EU.”
"According to the transcript, Mrs May is also reported to have agreed “to keep as many EU laws and institutions in effect as she could despite the current groundswell of anti-EU hysteria in Britain”
The Chequers Agreement formed the core of the Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration - which has, so far, been voted down 3 times by Parliament - but May is determined to ensure is passed before she leaves office.
It gets worse:
"The transcript also indicated that the Withdrawal Agreement was essentially a German production, with the original draft completed in May 2018 in Berlin. It was then sent to the Cabinet Office marked “Secret”.
"After much to-ing and fro-ing in the subsequent few weeks, including several telephone calls between Mrs May and the Chancellor the final draft was completed late in June, with the Chancellor telling Mrs May that she was happy with it."
"However, a few more small concessions by the UK would be needed later on, just to keep the EU happy."
The most telling part though, is that:
"David Davis was kept in the dark about this planning, as were other pro-Brexit ministers."
"The EU, by contrast, was happy to circulate the transcript of the final May/Merkel meeting to key EU and German embassies."
"What is more, Mrs May was probably unaware that the Chancellor had made a recording of this private meeting! Perhaps our Prime Minister would not have spoken so freely had she realised her words were being noted for posterity."
The article does point out that there is no proof of these allegations, but the source of the information is deemed to be accurate, from past, reliable revelations - and there is much other circumstantial evidence - as explained in the referenced article.
This does fit though with the alleged comment by J.C. Juncker when he "blurted out" that Cameron had assured him, that "he was going to use the Referendum to permanently lock-in the UK to the EU."
Which is no different to what Corbyn, the Labour Party (PLP) and the rest of our elected representatives are trying to do.
The only way to verify the information though, is through a copy of the transcript of the meeting between Merkel and May - anyone have one?
Where does that leave the UK?
It is clear from May's behaviour that she will not resign until the WA&PD is ratified by Parliament. So the statement to the 1922 Committee yesterday does not mean that she will be leaving anytime soon, unless, the Merkel-May Treaty is ratified.
Otherwise, May will have to be "dragged-out kicking and screaming" or removed at a General Election in 2022 - giving the EU plenty of time to, effectively, complete integration of its Member States. (see the latest euexit.com blog post "UK Parliament is not Sovereign)
May, Corbyn and the rest are just playing games.
Parliament is looking to make changes to the Political Declaration - which have no effect on the actual Treaty. It was named a "draft" Treaty, but it is not a "draft" in any sense of the word - it cannot be changed; except by the EU.
Meanwhile, May is hoping that the fear of the "Brexit" Party success will scare MP's into ratifying the WA&PD Treaty - they should be more afraid of the EU and the British People, if they ratify the Treaty.
Once the Treaty is ratified, then the UK will be under total EU (German) control - May and those who vote to accept the new Treaty will have committed the ultimate act of High Treason - contrary to English (Common) Law.
May, though, will be a heroine of the European Union (EUSSR)
Copyright © 2015-2019 euexit.com - All Rights Reserved.